Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping01:17

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybrid Supervised-Unsupervised Modeling for Post-Hurricane Private Well Contamination Risk Score Using Empirical Validation and Community-Informed Assessment.

GeoHealth·2026
Same author

PYCR1 induces ferroptosis via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to regulate the proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma.

Translational oncology·2026
Same author

Neural mechanisms of structural inference: An EEG investigation of linguistic phrase structure categorization.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

A High-Phosphogypsum Multi-Solid-Waste Cementitious Binder for Backfill: Cross-Scale Insight into Pore Structure and Strength Development.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Association Between Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Fracture Counts in U.S. Adults: A NHANES 2005-2020 Analysis.

Orthopedic reviews·2026
Same author

Impaired autophagy from TRPV4 activation drives α-synuclein pathology in a Parkinson's disease model: A toxicological insight.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Identification of differential aberrations in multiple-sample array CGH studies.

Huixia Judy Wang1, Jianhua Hu

  • 1Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA. wang@stat.ncsu.edu

Biometrics
|July 13, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new penalized regression method for detecting genomic copy number alterations in multiple cancer samples. The approach accurately identifies common and group-specific aberrant regions, outperforming single-sample methods.

More Related Videos

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is crucial for identifying genomic alterations.
  • Existing aCGH analysis methods often focus on single samples, limiting comparative studies.
  • Detecting common and distinct copy number variations across sample groups is essential for understanding disease heterogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical method for analyzing multiple aCGH samples from distinct groups.
  • To simultaneously identify shared and group-specific aberrant genomic regions.
  • To improve the accuracy of aberration detection compared to single-sample methods.

Main Methods:

  • A penalized regression approach utilizing a fused adaptive lasso penalty was developed.
  • The method accounts for spatial dependence among genomic clones.
  • Significance testing between neighboring clones and segments identifies aberrant regions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method accurately detects common aberrant regions within groups.
  • It also identifies regions with differing copy number changes between groups.
  • Simulation studies demonstrated superior performance over single-sample methods in reducing false positives and negatives.

Conclusions:

  • The new penalized regression method offers a robust approach for comparative aCGH analysis.
  • It effectively identifies both shared and unique genomic aberrations across sample groups.
  • The method shows promise for applications in cancer subtyping, such as breast cancer grade subgroups.