Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Geometric regularization for 2-D myocardial strain quantification in mice: an in-silico study
Florence Kremer1, Hon Fai Choi, Stian Langeland
1Division of Cardiovascular Imaging and Dynamics, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. florence.kremer@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
Geometric regularizers improve myocardial strain estimation in mice, particularly for circumferential strain, despite challenges with low frame rates in echocardiography. This enhances accuracy in both normal and infarcted models.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Myocardial strain quantification using 2-D speckle tracking in mice is challenging due to low frame rate-to-heart rate ratios.
- Significant decorrelation between frames necessitates robust regularization methods for accurate motion estimation.
- Geometric regularizers, enforcing specific motion field characteristics, offer potential but require comparative evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of different geometric regularizers for myocardial motion and strain estimation in murine echocardiography.
- To evaluate regularizer effectiveness in simulated normal and infarcted heart models.
- To identify optimal regularization strategies for improving strain quantification accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized simulated echocardiography datasets of murine hearts (normal and infarcted models).
- Applied and compared two geometric regularization methods: spatial curvature constraint and Gaussian convolution of lateral motion.
- Assessed myocardial strain estimation accuracy using root-mean-square (RMS) error for radial and circumferential strains.
Main Results:
- In normal models, spatial curvature regularization worsened radial strain (RMS error: 0.06 to 0.09) but improved circumferential strain (RMS error: 0.035 to 0.01).
- Gaussian convolution improved circumferential strain estimation (RMS error to 0.015) in normal models.
- In infarcted models, curvature regularization significantly improved circumferential strain (RMS error: 0.043 to 0.015), while Gaussian convolution improved it in remote regions (RMS error to 0.021).
Conclusions:
- Geometric regularization techniques offer significant improvements in myocardial strain quantification in mice, especially for circumferential strain.
- The choice of regularizer impacts strain estimation accuracy, with curvature and Gaussian methods showing differential benefits in normal and infarcted states.
- These findings aid in optimizing echocardiographic analysis for murine cardiovascular research.
More Related Videos
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021