Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms of Brown and Beige Adipocyte Regulation
Published on: January 5, 2024
The ASPP interaction network: electrostatic differentiation between pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins.
Hadar Benyamini1, Assaf Friedler
1The Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
The ASPP protein family regulates apoptosis differently. Structural and electrostatic differences in their binding interfaces, particularly with p53, Bcl-2, and NFκB, explain their opposing roles in cell death.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology
- Structural Biology
Background:
- The ASPP protein family comprises apoptosis regulators with opposing functions: ASPP1 and ASPP2 promote apoptosis, while iASPP inhibits it.
- The underlying molecular mechanisms driving these divergent functional outcomes remain largely unknown.
- The C-terminal ankyrin repeats and SH3 domain (ANK-SH3) are crucial for ASPP interactions with key apoptosis regulators like p53, Bcl-2, and NFκB.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the structural basis for the functional diversity within the ASPP protein family.
- To compare ASPP interactions at the protein interface level, examining both ASPP2(ANK-SH3) with different partners and various ASPP family members with specific partners.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of protein-protein interaction interfaces.
- Structural characterization of ASPP2(ANK-SH3) complexes with p53, Bcl-2, and NFκB.
- Analysis of electrostatic surface properties and residue composition at binding interfaces.
Main Results:
- ASPP2(ANK-SH3) utilizes distinct but spatially proximate binding sites on the same face for p53, Bcl-2, and NFκB.
- An intramolecular interaction site within ASPP2 overlaps with its intermolecular binding sites.
- ASPP1 and ASPP2 exhibit greater negative charge at key contact residues compared to iASPP, facilitating interactions with positively charged partners like p53CD, Bcl-2, and NFκB.
Conclusions:
- Electrostatic differences in the binding interfaces of ASPP proteins are a key determinant of their opposing roles in apoptosis regulation.
- A gain of positive charge on the non-binding face of ASPP1/2 may contribute to orienting the protein towards its negatively charged binding face.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Protein Networks
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics
Consider a case where both the mediums across a boundary are two different dielectric materials. Recall that the electric field and electric displacement are proportional and related through the material's permittivity....
Network Covalent Solids
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
The Extrinsic Apoptotic Pathway

