Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Common electrophysiological signatures of relative magnitude in both space and time.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Action impulsivity and attention deficits in patients at an early stage of Huntington disease.

Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)·2025
Same author

Why is there an error negativity on correct trials? A reappraisal.

Neuroscience letters·2024
Same author

On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2022
Same author

Errors and Action Monitoring: <i>Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile</i>.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2020
Same author

Ultrafast Structural Dynamics along the β-γ Phase Transition Path in MnAs.

Physical review letters·2019
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Probing Prediction-Related Processes in Language Using an EEG Word Stem Completion Paradigm.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Feedback processing in hypothesis testing: a Laplacian ERP study.

Laurence Carbonnell1, Jean-Paul Caverni, Franck Vidal

  • 1Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Antenne Toulon, Toulon, France. laurence.carbonnell@hotmail.fr

Psychophysiology
|July 20, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals how the brain processes feedback during hypothesis testing. Different brain regions track expectancies and performance accuracy, crucial for cognitive flexibility.

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery
09:53

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Behavioral adaptation in changing environments relies on feedback processing.
  • Feedback is essential for various cognitive functions, including learning and decision-making.
  • Hypothetico-deductive reasoning involves forming and testing hypotheses based on evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms of feedback processing during hypothetico-deductive reasoning.
  • To examine how electroencephalographical (EEG) activity reflects performance evaluation and expectancy in a hypothesis-testing task.
  • To enhance the spatial resolution of EEG data using surface Laplacian estimation.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a hypothesis-testing task with trial-by-trial feedback.
  • Electroencephalographical (EEG) activity was recorded throughout the task.
  • Surface Laplacian estimation was applied to EEG data to improve spatial localization.

Main Results:

  • Distinct patterns of brain activation were observed at different electrode locations.
  • Central and centro-parietal electrodes showed activity modulated by binary and gradual expectancies, respectively.
  • Parieto-occipital electrodes reflected the evaluation of performance accuracy (correct vs. false feedback).

Conclusions:

  • Feedback processing in hypothetico-deductive reasoning involves at least three distinct neural processes.
  • Specific brain regions are involved in tracking expectancies and evaluating performance outcomes.
  • These findings contribute to understanding the neural basis of cognitive control and adaptive behavior.