Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

14:14
Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis.
Thierry Aymard1, Alexander Kadner, Nazan Walpoth
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|July 20, 2010
Summary
The 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis offers safe, sutureless implantation for aortic stenosis patients, demonstrating favorable early hemodynamics and good survival rates. Design enhancements are ongoing to further improve this self-expanding valve technology.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Devices
Background:
- The 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis is a novel, self-expanding, equine pericardial valve designed for sutureless aortic valve replacement.
- Sutureless implantation aims to reduce procedure time and improve patient outcomes in aortic stenosis treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the technical aspects, safety, and short-term effectiveness of the 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.
- To assess early hemodynamic performance and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Main Methods:
- An outcome analysis of 28 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis receiving the 3f Enable valve.
- Data collected included patient demographics, EuroSCORE, operative times, hospital stay, and early postoperative complications.
Main Results:
- Mean aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 39 and 58 minutes, respectively.
- 30-day mortality was 3.5%, and 1-year survival was 86.2%.
- Favorable early hemodynamics with low transvalvular gradients were observed; 18.5% required permanent pacemakers.
Conclusions:
- The 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis can be safely implanted with good early hemodynamic results.
- Sutureless implantation with a self-expanding stent facilitates a large valve area, though procedure times require optimization.
- The study highlights the need for continued design and procedural enhancements for this aortic bioprosthesis.
