Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Consumer choices with variations in item price, delay, and opportunity cost.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2022
Same author

Tests of an indifference rule in variable-delay and double-reward choice procedures with humans.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2019
Same author

Human choices between variable and fixed rewards in hypothetical variable-delay and double-reward discounting procedures.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2016
Same author

Rats' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2014
Same author

Pigeons' choices with token stimuli in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2013
Same author

Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.

Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice.

James E Mazur1

  • 1Psychology Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT 06515, USA. mazurj1@southernct.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|July 28, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Pigeons often exclusively prefer the better option in discrete-trial choice tasks. Distributed preference occurs when factors like reinforcer delay or similar outcomes compete for control, not from sampling tendencies.

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats
09:12

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral science
  • Animal cognition
  • Operant conditioning

Background:

  • Understanding choice behavior is crucial in behavioral science.
  • Discrete-trial choice involves selecting between alternatives within a set time frame.
  • Pigeons are frequently used models for studying choice behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate conditions promoting exclusive vs. distributed preference in pigeons.
  • To evaluate existing theories of discrete-trial choice.
  • To determine factors influencing choice between alternatives with varying reinforcer characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments using pigeons were conducted on discrete-trial choice.
  • Experiment 1 manipulated delays to food reward (fixed and variable).
  • Experiment 2 manipulated probabilities of food reward, with random key location variation.

Main Results:

  • Exclusive preference for the better alternative was observed in some conditions.
  • Distributed preference occurred in other conditions, particularly when key location varied randomly.
  • Results challenge theories based on inherent sampling or matching tendencies.

Conclusions:

  • Exclusive preference is a common outcome in discrete-trial choice.
  • Distributed preference arises from competing factors or discriminability issues, not sampling.
  • Choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer characteristics and contextual variables.