Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 22, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Consumer choices with variations in item price, delay, and opportunity cost
Todd L McKerchar1, James E Mazur2
1Department of Psychology, Jacksonville State University.
Abstract:
Tversky and Kahneman (1981) told participants to imagine they were at a store about to purchase an item. They were asked if they would be willing to drive 20 min to another store to receive a $5 discount on the item's price. Most participants were willing, but only when the original price of the item was small ($15); when the original price was relatively large ($125), most said they would not drive 20 min for a $5 discount. We examined this framing effect in 296 participants, but instead used a psychophysical-adjustment procedure to obtain quantitative estimates of the discount required with different (a) item prices, (b) delays until the item's receipt, and (c) opportunity costs (in "driving" vs. "delivery" tasks). We systematically replicated Tversky and Kahneman's results, but also extended them by showing a substantial influence of opportunity costs on the consumer discounts required. A behavioral model of delay discounting-additive-utility theory-accounted for 97% of the variance in these consumer discounts.
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Framing Effects
Persuasion Strategies
Routes of Persuasion
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

