Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
The effect of gestational age on developmental outcomes: a longitudinal study in the first 2 years of life
A Sansavini1, S Savini, A Guarini
1Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, viale Berti Pichat 5, Bologna, Italy. alessandra.sansavini@unibo.it
Insights
Extremely low gestational age (ELGA) infants show poorer developmental outcomes and higher impairment rates. Gestational age and early development predict later outcomes in preterm infants without brain damage.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal development
- Developmental pediatrics
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes
Background:
- Immature central nervous system in preterm infants is vulnerable to inadequate stimulation.
- Gestational age (GA) is a risk factor for developmental issues, even without diagnosed cerebral damage.
- Understanding developmental trajectories in preterm infants is crucial for early intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test if GA impacts developmental outcomes and trajectories in preterm infants without major cerebral damage.
- To determine if GA and early developmental outcomes predict 24-month outcomes.
- To compare developmental trajectories across different gestational age groups.
Main Methods:
- Longitudinal assessment of 88 infants (ELGA, VLGA, full-term) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
- Utilized Griffiths Mental Development Scales for developmental quotient (DQ) and sub-scale quotient (SQ) assessments.
- Employed repeated measure multivariate analysis of variance and linear regression analysis.
Main Results:
- GA significantly correlated with overall DQ and specific SQ scores (locomotor, eye-hand coordination, performance).
- Extremely low gestational age (ELGA) infants demonstrated lower DQ and SQ scores compared to VLGA and full-term groups.
- GA and 12-month developmental outcomes were significant predictors of 24-month developmental outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Distinct developmental trajectories exist based on GA, with ELGA infants facing poorer outcomes and higher impairment rates.
- Very low gestational age (VLGA) infants showed some mild impairments.
- Repeated developmental assessments in the first two years are vital for monitoring preterm infants.
Background:
Extremely low and very low gestational age (ELGA and VLGA) constitutes a risk factor for development even in absence of cerebral damage, as an immature central nervous system is exposed to invasive and inadequate stimulation. We tested the hypothesis that GA impacts developmental outcomes and trajectories of preterms without major cerebral damage in the first 2 years of life, expecting poorer developmental outcomes and higher rate of impairment with the decreasing of GA. We also evaluated whether GA, together with developmental outcomes in the first year of life, was related to developmental outcomes at 24 months.
Methods:
Eighty-eight infants, divided into three GA groups (ELGA: ≤28 weeks; VLGA: 29-32 weeks; full term: >37 weeks) were assessed longitudinally at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using the Griffiths Mental Development Scales.
Results:
Use of a repeated measure multivariate analysis of variance resulted in several significant findings. GA was associated with the developmental quotient (DQ) scores (P= 0.006); and locomotor (P < 0.001), eye and hand co-ordination (P= 0.016) and performance (P= 0.040) sub-scale quotient (SQ) scores; age of evaluation was also associated with DQ scores (P= 0.002), and locomotor (P < 0.001) and performance (P < 0.001) SQ scores. In particular, ELGAs exhibited lower DQ and SQ scores compared with the VLGA and full-term groups; some ELGAs showed mild, moderate or severe cognitive impairments, while few VLGAs mild impairments. Linear regression analysis showed that GA (P= 0.034) and 12-month developmental outcome (P < 0.001) were related to 24-month developmental outcome.
Conclusions:
Different developmental trajectories emerged in relation to GA, with poorer developmental outcomes and higher rates of impairment in ELGAs and few mild impairments in VLGAs. The relevance of taking into account both GA and repeated assessments in the first 2 years of life was shown.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Longitudinal Studies
Teratogenicity
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Stella Chess...
