Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex links abstract planning to motor execution.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Parsing Reward Processing Substages With Multimodal EEG-fMRI.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

The Use of Behavioral Reconsolidation Interference in Depressive Disorders. A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Experimental Registered Report.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

The Reward Positivity signals a goal prediction error.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Investigating EEG Interbrain Synchrony: Methods to Gather Meaningful Evidence.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Right posterior theta reflects human parahippocampal phase resetting by salient cues during goal-directed navigation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Why humans deviate from rational choice.

Johannes Hewig1, Nora Kretschmer, Ralf H Trippe

  • 1Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany. hewig@biopsy.uni-jena.de

Psychophysiology
|July 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans reject unfair offers in decision-making games, even at personal cost. Brain activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and emotional responses predict these rejections, highlighting the role of affect in decision-making.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Rational choice theory posits humans optimize decisions for maximum utility.
  • Observed human behavior in games like the Ultimatum game contradicts this, showing punishment of unfairness despite personal loss.
  • The neural and affective underpinnings of such non-utility-maximizing decisions require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the affective correlates of decision-making in economic games.
  • To determine if neural signals related to reinforcement learning predict rejection of unfair offers.
  • To explore the relationship between emotional reactions, autonomic nervous system activity, and rejection decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Ultimatum and Dictator games to simulate decision-making scenarios.
  • Measured event-related brain potentials, specifically feedback negativity, originating from the anterior cingulate cortex.
  • Assessed subjective emotional reactions and autonomic nervous system activity during gameplay.

Main Results:

  • Feedback negativity, an anterior cingulate cortex signal linked to reinforcement learning, predicted the rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum game.
  • The decision to reject unfair offers correlated positively with heightened negative emotional responses.
  • Increased autonomic nervous system activity was also associated with the rejection of unfair proposals.

Conclusions:

  • Subjective emotional markers play a crucial role in guiding human decision-making, often overriding pure utility optimization.
  • The anterior cingulate cortex integrates reinforcement and punishment signals to generate affective markers that influence choices.
  • These findings challenge purely rational models of decision-making and emphasize the importance of emotional and neural processes.