The strategy for internal carotid stenosis with thrombus

O Masuo1, T Terada, M Tsuura

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery; Wakayama Medical College; Wakayama, Japan - omasuo@wakayama-med.ac.jp.

Insights

Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with thrombus presents risks like stroke. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with stenting, using a protective system, offers a viable treatment alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with thrombus poses a significant risk for cerebrovascular events.
  • Traditional treatment options may carry risks of embolic complications.
  • Novel endovascular techniques are being explored for managing complex carotid artery disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting with a protective system in patients with ICA stenosis and thrombus.
  • To compare outcomes of endovascular treatment versus surgical intervention in this specific patient cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 3 cases with ICA stenosis and thrombus.
  • All patients received initial anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.
  • Treatment strategies included carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in one case and PTA with stenting using a protective technique in two cases.

Main Results:

  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in one patient resulted in minor cerebral embolic infarction during the waiting period.
  • Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting with a protective system in two patients showed no embolic complications.
  • Postoperative angiography confirmed adequate lumen dilatation after PTA/stenting.

Conclusions:

  • Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting using a protective system appears to be a safe and effective alternative for treating internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis with thrombus.
  • This endovascular approach may reduce the risk of embolic complications compared to delayed surgical intervention in select cases.
Abstract