Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Anatomical Positions

Anatomical Positions

In anatomy, several standard anatomical positions are used as references for describing the position and orientation of different body parts. These positions help provide a common frame of reference when discussing anatomical structures. The anatomical position is the standard reference point for describing the body's position and orientation. In this position:
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergy specialists in the elective surgical setting: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol.

Anaesthesia reports·2026

Same author

Association of Acute Stroke and Glycemic Abnormalities with Stroke Outcome: A Hospital Based Study.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ·2025

Same author

Knee arthroplasty compared with joint distraction for osteoarthritis: a phase III randomized controlled trial.

Bone & joint open·2025

Same author

The outcomes of acute periprosthetic joint infection following unicompartmental knee replacement managed with early debridement, Antibiotics, and implant retention.

The Knee·2024

Same author

A cost analysis of treating postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip replacement surgery in a UK tertiary referral centre.

Injury·2022

Same author

Physician and patient perceptions of surgical procedures for osteoarthritis of the knee in the United States, Europe, and Japan: results of a real-world study.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2022

Same journal

Comorbidities in Perthes' disease: a case control study using the General Practice Research database.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does a bilateral or unilateral screw technique affect surgical outcome?

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Anterior deltoid deficiency in reverse total shoulder replacement: a biomechanical study with cadavers.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Long-term results of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability in patients with hypermobility: a case control study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing.

G Grammatopoulos¹, H Pandit, S Glyn-Jones

¹Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume

|August 3, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Minimizing pseudotumor risk in hip resurfacing requires precise acetabular component positioning. Optimal radiographic angles of 45° inclination and 20° anteversion significantly reduce pseudotumor formation, enhancing patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty

Published on: February 27, 2018

Area of Science:

Orthopedic surgery
Biomaterials science
Radiology

Background:

Pseudotumours are a rare but serious complication following hip resurfacing surgery.
These adverse tissue reactions are linked to metal debris, often caused by edge loading from improper acetabular component orientation.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify the optimal acetabular component orientation during hip resurfacing to minimize the risk of pseudotumour formation.
To establish target angles for surgical implantation based on radiographic measurements.

Main Methods:

A case-control study comparing 31 hip resurfacings revised for pseudotumours with 58 controls with satisfactory outcomes.
Radiographic inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular component were measured using EBRA software on pelvic radiographs.

Main Results:

No significant difference in mean inclination or anteversion angles between pseudotumour cases and controls, but greater variation in pseudotumour cases.
An optimal radiographic zone of approximately 45° inclination and 20° anteversion was identified.
Pseudotumour incidence was four times lower when the component was implanted within this defined zone.

Conclusions:

Surgeons should aim for a radiographic acetabular component inclination of 45° (±10°) and anteversion of 20° (±10°) to minimize pseudotumour risk.
To achieve these radiographic targets, surgeons may need to aim for operative angles of 40° inclination and 25° anteversion due to radiographic vs. operative differences.