Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrative analysis of RNA expression signatures and recurrent genomic alterations before treatment: link to menopausal status, short-term endocrine therapy response and disease-free survival in luminal breast cancer.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy.

ESMO open·2022
Same author

MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of primary tumor for pain control in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): an open randomized, multicentric, parallel group clinical trial (MASPAC).

Radiation oncology (London, England)·2022
Same author

Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2019
Same author

[Biomarkers and imaging for diagnosis and stratification of rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritis in the BMBF consortium ArthroMark].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2018
Same author

[Big data from clinical routine].

Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie·2018
Same journal

Full robotic endovascular treatment for various head and neck hemorrhagic lesions.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Publisher's note.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Expression of Concern.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Initial experience with the antithrombogenic-coated CARESTOstent for venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A multicenter study".

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Transcirculation retrograde deployment of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for a superior cerebellar artery aneurysm.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Retrieval of a fractured radial access catheter from the axillary artery.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

How to avoid bias: methodological vigilance.

U Mansmann1

  • 1Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Klinikum Benjamin Franklin, Free University; Berlin, Germany.

Interventional Neuroradiology : Journal of Peritherapeutic Neuroradiology, Surgical Procedures and Related Neurosciences
|August 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Methodological vigilance is crucial for reducing bias in clinical research strategies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Researchers must identify and address potential biases to ensure reliable study conclusions and valid data synthesis.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Bias poses a significant challenge in clinical research, potentially compromising study validity.
  • Methodological rigor is essential for minimizing bias in research design and execution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of methodological vigilance in reducing bias in clinical research.
  • To highlight the importance of identifying and considering biases when interpreting study findings.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of common sources of bias in clinical research.
  • Emphasis on the application of methodological standards and guidelines.
  • Exploration of bias mitigation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses.

Main Results:

  • Methodological vigilance is fundamental to bias avoidance in research.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) offer the greatest potential for bias reduction but require careful execution.
  • Failure to maintain vigilance can negate the benefits of rigorous trial designs.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be aware of and actively manage potential sources of bias.
  • Methodological vigilance is necessary throughout the research process, including data synthesis.
  • Consistent application of standards ensures the integrity and reliability of clinical research findings.