Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic cells are...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Maintenance of the ES Cell State
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Regulation of endothelial cell chromatin availability and transcription factor activity during arterial-venous specification.
Replacement-Based Ageing Interventions for Systemic Rejuvenation: Shaping Longevity Science and Clinical Directions.
Elucidating genes sufficient for viral entry into cells through sequential genome-wide CRISPR activation screens.
Reprogramming Stars #27: Drawing Inspiration from Reprogramming to Guide Stem Cell Differentiation: An Interview with Dr. Kyle Loh.
Discovery of a pre-vein progenitor that requires VEGF/ERK inhibition to complete vein differentiation.
DNMT3A R882H Is Not Required for Disease Maintenance in Primary Human AML but Is Associated with Increased Leukemia Stem Cell Frequency.
Patient-derived organoids reveal ductal dysfunction and CFTR-modulator responses in chronic pancreatitis.
Lineage plasticity driven by GATA6 loss fuels colorectal cancer metastasis.
Quantitative molecular cartography of emergency myelopoiesis reveals conserved modules of hematopoietic activation.
Paired pre- and post-transplant human immunoprofiling identifies an IFN-γ-JAK1 axis limiting stem-cell-derived RPE engraftment.
ENPP1 blockade with a humanized monoclonal antibody enhances renal repair after acute kidney injury.
ZNF512B safeguards genome integrity at regulatory regions to repress the SASP and inflammation.
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Reprogramming Primary Amniotic Fluid and Membrane Cells to Pluripotency in Xeno-free Conditions
Published on: November 27, 2017
Recreating pluripotency?
1Genome Institute of Singapore, Stem Cell & Developmental Biology, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Two articles challenge previous findings on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). This sparks debate on accurate microarray data analysis methods in stem cell research.
More Related Videos
08:01A Two-Step Strategy that Combines Epigenetic Modification and Biomechanical Cues to Generate Mammalian Pluripotent Cells
Published on: August 29, 2020
09:07Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
Published on: June 10, 2018
Area of Science:
- Stem cell biology
- Genomics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Previous research reported significant transcriptional differences between human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs).
- These findings have implications for understanding pluripotency and cell reprogramming.
Discussion:
- Two recent articles raise concerns regarding the analytical methods used in the original study.
- The debate centers on the appropriate statistical and computational approaches for analyzing microarray data in stem cell comparisons.
Key Insights:
- The validity of the initial conclusions regarding hESC and hiPSC transcriptional profiles is questioned.
- The discussion highlights the critical importance of robust data analysis in stem cell research.
Outlook:
- This discourse is expected to refine best practices for microarray data analysis in the field.
- Further research may be needed to establish definitive transcriptional similarities or differences between hESCs and hiPSCs.