Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations
Sherif Soliman1, Phillip J Resnick
1DepartmentofPsychiatry, CaseWestern Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. docsoli@gmail.com
Abstract:
Competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence) is the most requested forensic psychiatric evaluation, with an estimated 60,000 referrals annually. The challenge of detecting feigned incompetence has not been systematically studied until the past decade. Estimates of feigned adjudicative incompetence vary from 8 to 21%. This article reviews techniques for detecting malingered psychosis and malingered cognitive impairment during competence evaluations. Specific techniques for assessing feigned adjudicative incompetence and estimating the malingerer's genuine abilities are discussed. A stepwise approach to suspected feigned adjudicative incompetence is proffered.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Torts II
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.