Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...

The Representativeness Heuristic

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

Equity Theory

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

Magical Thinking

Magical Thinking

Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Strategies to increase medications for opioid use disorder in hospital settings in the USA: protocol for a scoping review.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

No cognitive or psychological impact from returning research Alzheimer disease biomarkers: A delayed-start, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

The Tree of Life Synagogue Attack: A Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol-18 Examination of Pre-Attack Warnings and Post-Attack Contagion and Copycat Effects.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2026

Same author

ARCH × Φ: Sterols and the evolution of gated biological execution.

Bio Systems·2026

Same author

Molybdenum-Catalyzed One-Step Synthesis of Tetrahydroquinolines.

Precision chemistry·2026

Same author

Extremism, Terrorism, and Mental Disorder.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)·2026

Same journal

National Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Exposure to Correctional Psychiatry.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Pregnancy Criminalization in the United States.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

In Reply.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Letter.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Managing Violence in State Hospitals with Forensic Patients.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

Same journal

Plea Bargaining Participation and Competency Evaluation Considerations.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Extreme Overvalued Beliefs.

Tahir Rahman¹, Sarah M Hartz², Willa Xiong²

¹Dr. Rahman and Dr. Hartz are Associate Professors, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri. Dr. Xiong is Assistant Professor, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. Dr. Meloy is Clinical Professor, University of California, San Diego. Dr. Janofsky is Associate Professor, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Harry is Associate Professor, University of Missouri-Columbia. Dr. Resnick is Professor, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. trahman@wustl.edu.

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

|May 16, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Forensic psychiatrists can reliably distinguish extreme overvalued beliefs from delusions and obsessions. This suggests including "extreme overvalued belief" in diagnostic manuals for better clarity in forensic evaluations.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 21, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Psychopathology
Clinical Psychology

Background:

Extreme overvalued beliefs are shared within cultural or religious groups and can lead to intense emotional commitment and violent behavior.
Differentiating these beliefs from delusions and obsessions is crucial in forensic contexts.
Existing diagnostic manuals may benefit from clearer definitions of such beliefs.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the ability of forensic psychiatrists to differentiate between extreme overvalued beliefs, delusions, and obsessions.
To evaluate the reliability of these diagnostic distinctions in a forensic population.
To explore the potential inclusion of "extreme overvalued belief" in future diagnostic glossaries.

Main Methods:

A study involving 109 forensic psychiatrists.
Participants were presented with 12 randomized fictional vignettes depicting criminal behavior.
Psychiatrists were asked to identify the motive as an obsession, delusion, or extreme overvalued belief based on provided definitions.

Main Results:

Strong interrater agreement was observed for the identification of extreme overvalued beliefs (kappa = 0.91).
High reliability was also found for distinguishing delusions (kappa = 0.99) and obsessions (kappa = 0.98).
The findings indicate a substantial ability among forensic psychiatrists to identify these distinct belief systems when provided with clear definitions.

Conclusions:

Forensic psychiatrists demonstrate a strong capacity to differentiate extreme overvalued beliefs from delusions and obsessions.
The study supports the utility of clear definitions in diagnostic assessments.
Inclusion of "extreme overvalued belief" in future diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, is recommended to enhance diagnostic precision.