Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

1.7K
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
1.7K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

868
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
868
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

1.6K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.6K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuous foraging behavior shapes patch-leaving decisions in pigeons: a 3D tracking study.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Temporal recalibration in schizophrenia: a compensatory timing trap?

Neuroscience of consciousness·2026
Same author

Neural correlates of appetitive extinction learning: an fMRI study with actively participating pigeons.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Beyond traditional tests: Assessing face recognition in mild cognitive impairment.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same author

An individual participant data meta-analysis of how physical activity relates to affective well-being in daily life.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Achieving cell-type specific transduction with adeno-associated viral vectors in pigeons.

Current research in neurobiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Visual processing asymmetries in change detection.

Osman Iyilikci1, Cordula Becker, Onur Güntürkün

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ege University, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. osman.iyilikci@ege.edu.tr

Perception
|August 12, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Change detection is faster in the left visual field due to attentional mechanisms. This left-side superiority in visual change detection is independent of inspection time, highlighting a visual processing benefit.

More Related Videos

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Change detection relies heavily on attentional mechanisms.
  • The influence of asymmetrical visuo-spatial attention on visual change detection remains unclear.
  • Spatial tasks often lead to right-hemisphere activation, suggesting potential visual processing asymmetries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of spatial tasks on visual processing asymmetries.
  • To examine how these asymmetries affect change detection in different visual fields.
  • To determine if a left visual field advantage exists for change detection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a change detection task.
  • Changes were presented in either the left or right visual fields.
  • Task involved varying levels of attentional load through spatial tasks.
  • Inspection time was controlled and varied.

Main Results:

  • Participants demonstrated significantly faster change detection in the left visual field compared to the right.
  • This left-side superiority in change detection was consistent across different inspection times.
  • Spatial tasks induced measurable asymmetries in visual processing.

Conclusions:

  • A distinct left-side advantage exists for visual change detection.
  • This advantage appears to stem from inherent visual processing benefits for the left visual field.
  • Attentional mechanisms play a crucial role in modulating visual change detection performance.