Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
Published on: October 31, 2025
Prognostic factors for patients after curative resection for proximal gastric cancer
Donghui Zhao1, Huimian Xu, Kai Li
1Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Unit of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, China. zhaodh2001@yahoo.com.cn
Abstract:
The factors influencing the long-term survival of patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) after curative resection were investigated. Data from 171 patients who underwent curative resection for PGC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were grouped according to the clinicopathological factors and operative procedures. The tumor depth (T stage) and lymph node metastasis (pN stage) were graded according to the fifth edition of TNM Staging System published by UICC in 1997. The metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) was divided into four levels: 0%, <10%, 10%-30% and >30%. The data of survival rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) and Cox regression model. The 5-year overall survival rate of 171 patients was 37.32%. The univariate analysis demonstrated that the survival time of the postoperative patients with PGC was related to tumor size (chi2=4.57, P=0.0325), gross type (chi2=21.38, P<0.001), T stage (chi2=27.91, P<0.001), pN stage (chi2=44.72, P<0.001), MLR (chi2=61.12, P<0.001), TNM stage (chi2=44.91, P<0.001), and range of gastrectomy (chi2=4.36, P=0.0368). Multivariate analysis showed that MLR (chi2=10.972, P=0.001), pN stage (chi2=6.640, P=0.010), TNM stage (chi2=7.081, P=0.007), T stage (chi2=7.687, P=0.006) and gross type (chi2=6.252, P=0.012) were the independent prognostic factors. In addition, the prognosis of patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) was superior to that of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the cases of tumor>or=5 cm (chi2=6.31, P=0.0120), Borrmann III/IV (chi2=7.96, P=0.0050), T4 (chi2=4.57, P=0.0325), pN2 (chi2=5.52, P=0.0188), MLR 10%-30% (chi2=4.46, P=0.0347), MLR>30% (chi2=13.34, P=0.0003), TNM III (chi2=14.05, P=0.0002) or TNM IV stage (chi2=4.37, P=0.0366); and combining splenectomy was beneficial to the cases of T3 (chi2=5.68, P=0.0171) or MLR>30% (chi2=6.11, P=0.0134). It was concluded that MLR, pN stage, TNM stage, T stage, and gross type had advantages in providing a precise prognostic evaluation for patients undergoing curative resection for PGC, in which MLR was the most valuable index. TG and combining splenectomy were useful to improve the prognosis to patients with PGC of TNM III/IV stage, serosa invasion, or extensive regional lymph node metastasis.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
03:05Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024