Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sequential model of two-choice intensity identification.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

[Doping in recreational sports].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?

Tanja Leonhard1, Susana Ruiz Fernández, Rolf Ulrich

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, University of Tubingen, Friedrichstr. 21, 72072 Tu¨bingen, Germany. tanja.leonhard@uni-tuebingen.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|August 20, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Participants strategically reorder cognitive tasks to optimize performance, especially when tasks vary in difficulty or when stimulus timing is predictable. This shows flexible central processing in psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The psychological refractory period (PRP) describes the delay in responding to a second stimulus when it closely follows a first stimulus.
  • Understanding central processing order is crucial for explaining cognitive workload and task interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of task characteristics and stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) predictability on central processing order in PRP tasks.
  • To test the optimization account, predicting participants would prioritize faster Task 2 processing at short SOAs.

Main Methods:

  • Five PRP experiments were conducted using time-consuming Task 1 (mental rotation or memory scanning) and a simple Task 2 (tone judgment).
  • Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) varied, with a blocked SOA condition introduced in some experiments.
  • Participant responses and reaction times were recorded to infer processing order.

Main Results:

  • A tendency for participants to process Task 2's central stage before Task 1's was observed at short SOAs, supporting the optimization account.
  • This optimization effect was more pronounced for the mental rotation task and the blocked SOA condition.
  • Task 1 characteristics and SOA predictability influenced the central processing order.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive preparation, Task 1 complexity, and response time optimization strategies significantly impact the central processing order in PRP paradigms.
  • Participants exhibit flexible control over cognitive task sequencing to enhance overall efficiency.