Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for k_a Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients

Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients

The distribution law or Nernst's distribution law is the law that governs the distribution of a solute between two immiscible solvents. This law, also known as the partition law, states that if a solute is added to the mixture of two immiscible solvents at a constant temperature, the solute is distributed between the two solvents in such a way that the ratio of solute concentrations in the solvents remains constant at equilibrium.
For extracting a solute from an aqueous phase into an organic...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Correction: Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Same author

Long-Term Opioid Therapy Tapering and Risk of Substance Use Disorder and Overdose: Differences by Opioid Dose and Duration.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026

Same author

Integration of aggregate data in causally interpretable meta-analysis by inverse weighting.

Biometrics·2026

Same author

Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates and Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes.

JAMA·2026

Same author

IV-learner: learning conditional average treatment effects using instrumental variables.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Doubly robust estimation of attributable fractions.

Arvid Sjölander¹, Stijn Vansteelandt

¹Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. arvid.sjolander@ki.se

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)

|August 20, 2010

Summary

This study introduces doubly robust estimators for the attributable fraction (AF), a key measure of exposure impact on disease. These new methods improve accuracy by using models for both outcome and exposure, offering robust estimates in epidemiological research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Public Health

Background:

The attributable fraction (AF) quantifies disease impact from specific exposures.
Traditional AF estimation relies on maximum likelihood with outcome regression models.
Inverse probability weighting offers an alternative using exposure models.

Purpose of the Study:

To derive and evaluate doubly robust estimators for the attributable fraction (AF).
To enhance the reliability of AF estimation in epidemiological studies.

Main Methods:

Development of doubly robust estimators for AF.
These estimators require both outcome and exposure models.
Consistency is achieved if at least one model is correctly specified.

Main Results:

Doubly robust estimators provide consistent AF estimates when either the outcome or exposure model is correct.
The proposed methods are applicable to cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control study designs.

Conclusions:

Doubly robust estimators offer a more reliable approach to estimating the attributable fraction.
These methods increase statistical power and reduce bias in observational studies.