Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026
Investigating von Willebrand Factor Pathophysiology Using a Flow Chamber Model of von Willebrand Factor-platelet String Formation
Published on: August 14, 2017
Evaluation of an automated von Willebrand factor activity assay in von Willebrand disease
Marc Trossaërt1, Catherine Ternisien, Armelle Lefrancois
1Laboratory of Hematology, Haemophilia Center, University Hospital, Nantes, France. marc.trossaert@chu-nantes.fr
We evaluated the use of the turbidimetric HemosIL von Willebrand Factor (VWF) Activity assay (VWF:Act) on the STA-R automated coagulometer (Stago, Asnières, France) for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). For this, we prospectively screened 268 patients. As a second part, we retrospectively assayed 111 patients with well-defined VWD subtype. In the first prospective study, we demonstrate that in most cases of VWD, VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and VWF:Act are highly correlated but that they both cannot be considered a good screening assay when used alone, since they could miss about 25% of VWF abnormalities. However, the association of VWF:Act analysis and the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) test constitutes an excellent screening strategy. In our second retrospective study concerning VWD subtypes, VWF:RCo and VWF:Act were well correlated but could be very discrepant, especially for some cases of type 2M VWD. We consider that VWF:RCo remains the "reference assay" for VWD subtype classification.
We evaluated the use of the turbidimetric HemosIL von Willebrand Factor (VWF) Activity assay (VWF:Act) on the STA-R automated coagulometer (Stago, Asnières, France) for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). For this, we prospectively screened 268 patients. As a second part, we retrospectively assayed 111 patients with well-defined VWD subtype. In the first prospective study, we demonstrate that in most cases of VWD, VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and VWF:Act are highly correlated but that they both cannot be considered a good screening assay when used alone, since they could miss about 25% of VWF abnormalities. However, the association of VWF:Act analysis and the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) test constitutes an excellent screening strategy. In our second retrospective study concerning VWD subtypes, VWF:RCo and VWF:Act were well correlated but could be very discrepant, especially for some cases of type 2M VWD. We consider that VWF:RCo remains the "reference assay" for VWD subtype classification.
