Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
Published on: January 26, 2024
Going the distance: spatial scale of athletic experience affects the accuracy of path integration
Alastair D Smith1, Christina J Howard, Niall Alcock
1School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Alastair.Smith@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract:
Evidence suggests that athletically trained individuals are more accurate than untrained individuals in updating their spatial position through idiothetic cues. We assessed whether training at different spatial scales affects the accuracy of path integration. Groups of rugby players (large-scale training) and martial artists (small-scale training) participated in a triangle-completion task: they were led (blindfolded) along two sides of a right-angled triangle and were required to complete the hypotenuse by returning to the origin. The groups did not differ in their assessment of the distance to the origin, but rugby players were more accurate than martial artists in assessing the correct angle to turn (heading), and landed significantly closer to the origin. These data support evidence that distance and heading components can be dissociated. Furthermore, they suggest that the spatial scale at which an individual is trained may affect the accuracy of one component of path integration but not the other.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Distance Problem
The Distance Formula
Distance Measurements by Taping
Integration Applied to Polar Coordinates to Find Arc Lengths
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions

