Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioethics: its philosophical basis and application.

H M Sass1

  • 1Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Balancing autonomy with paternalism for psychiatric patients? Ambiguities in personal choice and adcance directivesments [sic].

Taiwan yi xue ren wen xue kan·2004
Same author

Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research.

Taiwan yi xue ren wen xue kan·2004
Same author

Educating and sensitizing health professionals on human rights and ethical considerations: the interactive role of ethics and expertise.

Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2002
Same author

[Is there a need for new clinical-ethical models in medical research?].

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2002
Same author

Introduction: European bioethics on a rocky road.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001
Same author

Attitudes of healthcare professionals toward clinical decisions in palliative care: a cross-cultural comparison.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2000
Same journal

Cervical cancer screening in the Bahamas.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
Same journal

Program for the control of cervical cancer in Peru.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
Same journal

Cervical cancer screening programs: technical cooperation in the Caribbean.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
Same journal

Workshop on screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Central America.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
Same journal

Community promotion and dissemination of programs to prevent cervical cancer.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
Same journal

Screening for cervical cancer in Brazil.

Bulletin of the Pan American Health Organization·1996
See all related articles

Modern medicine integrates advanced technology with evolving social attitudes, significantly impacting healthcare. This overview explores key changes and their connection to medical bioethics developments.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Sociology of Medicine
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Technological advancements have revolutionized medical interventions.
  • Societal and cultural shifts are increasingly influencing healthcare delivery and practice.
  • The intersection of technology, ethics, and societal values is critical in contemporary medicine.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of significant changes in medicine.
  • To examine the relationship between technological and socio-cultural shifts.
  • To explore the implications of these changes for medical bioethics.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of technological advancements in medicine.
  • Analysis of socio-cultural trends impacting healthcare.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Synthesis of findings concerning medical bioethics.

    • Main Results:

    • Technological progress enables previously impossible medical interventions.
    • Evolving social and cultural attitudes significantly affect healthcare practices.
    • Medical bioethics is shaped by both technological and societal transformations.

    Conclusions:

    • Contemporary medicine is a complex interplay of technology and socio-cultural factors.
    • Understanding these changes is essential for navigating the future of medical bioethics.
    • The evolution of healthcare necessitates ongoing ethical consideration and adaptation.