Application of multiple methods to study the immunization programme in an urban area of Guinea

During 1988-89, studies were conducted to evaluate the immunization system in Conakry, Guinea. The first, a health facility survey, found that health staff screened the vaccination status of only 30% of children who presented for curative care. A sterile syringe and needle were used for less than half of the injections. In the second survey, key informant interviews with vaccinators and health centre chiefs showed that there were minimal lines of communication between health workers and the community, but that health workers did not perceive this to be a problem. Focus group discussions in the community revealed a high level of general knowledge about vaccine-preventable diseases. However, mothers did not know how many vaccinations their children should receive or by what age they should be completed. They complained of long waiting times in health centres, the high costs of vaccination, poor rapport with health workers, and the occurrence of abscesses after vaccination. The final study, a "knowledge, attitudes, and practice" community survey, showed that missed immunization opportunities and inappropriately timed vaccinations reduced potential vaccine coverage by almost 30% among children with vaccination cards. Higher socioeconomic status, delivery in hospital, and whether mothers perceived the vaccinations to be affordable affected whether the child began the immunization series. Once a child had entered the immunization system, completion of the series was determined by the mother's education level, employment status, and experience with vaccination services.