Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus parameters in detection and reaction time.

S M Abel1, D K Rajan, C Giguere

  • 1Hearing Research Laboratory, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Scandinavian Audiology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Monitoring and Modeling the Rapid Evolution of Earth's Newest Volcanic Island: <i>Hunga Tonga Hunga Ha'apai</i> (Tonga) Using High Spatial Resolution Satellite Observations.

Geophysical research letters·2018
Same author

Histology of solid lateral cervical masses biopsied in children.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2013
Same author

Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids.

Clinical radiology·2010
Same author

Transarterial chemoembolisation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from a North American cancer centre.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2006
Same author

Sound source identification with ANR earmuffs.

Noise & health·2005
Same author

Hepatocellular carcinoma supplied by the ileocolic branch of the superior mesenteric artery.

Clinical radiology·2005
Same journal

Vision and hearing in old age.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Two families with phenotypically different hereditary low frequency hearing impairment: longitudinal data and linkage analysis.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Age and noise-induced hearing loss.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Bilateral hearing aids--effects and consequences from a user perspective.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.

Scandinavian audiology·2002
Same journal

Will hearing healthcare be affordable in the new millennium.

Scandinavian audiology·2001
See all related articles

Stimulus energy predicts detection threshold, which decreases with longer durations and shorter rise/decay times. Reaction times also decrease with duration but are not interchangeable with detection thresholds.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychophysics
  • Signal detection theory

Background:

  • Understanding the relationship between auditory detection thresholds and reaction times is crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
  • Previous research has explored various auditory parameters, but the interplay between stimulus characteristics and psychophysical measures requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between detection threshold and reaction time for pure tones.
  • To examine how stimulus frequency, duration, and rise/decay time influence these measures.

Main Methods:

  • A two-interval forced-choice signal detection paradigm was employed.
  • Pure tones with varying frequencies (500, 4000 Hz), durations (50, 300 ms), and rise/decay times (10, 100 ms) were presented to three normal-hearing subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detection thresholds and reaction times were recorded.

    • Main Results:

    • Stimulus energy effectively predicted detection thresholds.
    • Detection thresholds decreased with increased stimulus duration and decreased rise/decay time.
    • Reaction times decreased with increased duration but were unaffected by rise/decay time changes.
    • Significant inter-subject variability in reaction times was observed for similar hearing acuity levels.

    Conclusions:

    • Detection threshold and reaction time are not interchangeable psychophysical measures.
    • The non-monotonic relationship and inter-subject variability highlight the distinct nature of these auditory perception metrics.