Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the test...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparison of Histopathologic Features of Right and Left Sided Colon Cancer.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026

Same author

Expression of growth mediators in the gingival crevicular fluid of patients with aggressive periodontitis undergoing periodontal surgery.

Clinical oral investigations·2018

Same author

Clinical outcomes of a vitrified donor oocyte programme: A single UK centre experience.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2018

Same author

Career satisfaction and work-life balance of specialist orthodontists within the UK/ROI.

British dental journal·2017

Same author

Time to onset of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.

Oral diseases·2017

Same author

Prevalence and treatment of necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (NUG) in the British Armed Forces: a case-control study.

Clinical oral investigations·2016

Same journal

Comorbidities in Perthes' disease: a case control study using the General Practice Research database.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

The treatment of complex tibial shaft fractures by the Ilizarov method.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does a bilateral or unilateral screw technique affect surgical outcome?

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Anterior deltoid deficiency in reverse total shoulder replacement: a biomechanical study with cadavers.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Long-term results of dorsal intercarpal ligament capsulodesis for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

Same journal

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability in patients with hypermobility: a case control study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Statistical power in testing a hypothesis.

¹Head of Biostatistics Unit, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, 256 Grays Inn Road, London, UK. a.petrie@eastman.ucl.ac.uk

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume

|August 28, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Determining the right number of participants is crucial for reliable study results. Statistical power analysis helps find the optimal sample size, ensuring your research findings are statistically significant and valid.

More Related Videos

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

Rodent-Proof Wall: An Efficient Physical Method for Controlling Rodents and its Efficiency Statistics

Rodent-Proof Wall: An Efficient Physical Method for Controlling Rodents and its Efficiency Statistics

Published on: March 8, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Making Record-efficiency SnS Solar Cells by Thermal Evaporation and Atomic Layer Deposition

Published on: May 22, 2015

Rodent-Proof Wall: An Efficient Physical Method for Controlling Rodents and its Efficiency Statistics

Rodent-Proof Wall: An Efficient Physical Method for Controlling Rodents and its Efficiency Statistics

Published on: March 8, 2024

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

Accurate treatment comparisons require appropriate sample sizes for statistical validity.
Hypothesis testing is fundamental in clinical research for drawing reliable conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

To explain the importance of statistical power analysis in determining optimal study sample sizes.
To highlight the role of power in hypothesis testing for ensuring statistically significant results.

Main Methods:

The concept of statistical power in hypothesis testing is described.
The relationship between statistical power and sample size determination is discussed.

Main Results:

Statistical power analysis is essential for achieving statistically viable conclusions.
Understanding test power increases the likelihood of correctly identifying significant results.

Conclusions:

Implementing statistical power analysis is vital for robust clinical trial design.
Optimal sample size selection, guided by power analysis, enhances research credibility.