Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Developmental progression of looking and reaching performance on the A-not-B task
Kimberly Cuevas1, Martha Ann Bell
1Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. kcuevas@vt.edu
Infants show better object permanence in looking tasks than reaching tasks early in development. This difference highlights varying brain circuitry maturation for different response types in early cognitive skills.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuropsychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Successful A-not-B task performance relies on cognitive skills like working memory, inhibition, attention, and frontal lobe maturation.
- The A-not-B task assesses object permanence and executive functions in infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To longitudinally examine the developmental progression of infants' performance on both looking and reaching versions of the A-not-B task.
- To investigate how differences in response modalities (looking vs. reaching) affect early cognitive skill assessment.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal study design was employed.
- Twenty infants were tested monthly from 5 to 10 months of age on both looking and reaching A-not-B tasks.
- Performance was analyzed across different trial types (non-reversal A, reversal B).
Main Results:
- Infants demonstrated higher object permanence scores on the looking version from 5 to 8 months.
- Comparable performance across looking and reaching modalities was observed at 9 and 10 months.
- Infants consistently performed better on looking reversal (B) trials than reaching reversal trials.
Conclusions:
- Early developmental differences in A-not-B task performance between looking and reaching modalities are significant.
- These performance disparities are likely attributable to the maturation of brain circuitry specific to each response type.
- The findings underscore the importance of considering response modality when assessing infant cognitive development.
More Related Videos
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
05:10An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
Published on: March 17, 2023