Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment01:28

Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

Angle-closure glaucoma, or closed-angle glaucoma, is an eye condition where the iris bulges out and blocks the iridocorneal angle, resulting in a buildup of aqueous humor and increased intraocular pressure. Immediate medical attention is necessary due to the sudden onset of symptoms. The treatment for angle-closure glaucoma includes short-term and long-term approaches. Short-term treatment involves using eye drops like pilocarpine to lower intraocular pressure by increasing aqueous humor...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment01:27

Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment

In open-angle glaucoma, the iridocorneal angle remains open, but the trabecular meshwork becomes stiff, slowing down the outflow of aqueous humor. This causes a buildup of aqueous humor in the anterior chamber, leading to a sudden increase in intraocular pressure. The treatment for open-angle glaucoma focuses on reducing the elevated intraocular pressure by either decreasing the secretion of aqueous humor or increasing its outflow.
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview01:25

Glaucoma: Overview

Glaucoma is an eye condition characterized by increased intraocular pressure that damages the retina and optic nerve, leading to irreversible blindness if left untreated. The human eye has various components, including the cornea, iris, pupil, lens, and optic nerve. Aqueous humor is secreted by the epithelium of the ciliary body in the posterior chamber and flows through the trabecular meshwork and canal of Schlemm, maintaining normal intraocular pressure. The trabecular meshwork and the canal...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anterior segment indices in mentally retarded children.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Auto-refraction versus subjective refraction in different phakic and pseudophakic conditions: the Tehran Geriatric Eye Study (TGES).

International journal of ophthalmology·2023
Same author

Comparison of different corneal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence for diagnosis of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2023
Same author

Vector analysis of astigmatism correction after PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE for myopic astigmatism.

International ophthalmology·2023
Same author

Prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and its associated factors in 50-74 years old Iranian adults: a population-based study.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2023
Same author

Epidemiological aspect of retinoblastoma in the world: a review of recent advance studies.

International journal of ophthalmology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized LASIK: a randomized clinical trial comparing contralateral eyes.

Mohammad Miraftab1, Mohammad A Seyedian, Hassan Hashemi

  • 1Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
|September 16, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Wavefront-guided LASIK and wavefront-optimized LASIK showed similar outcomes for correcting myopic astigmatism. Both procedures resulted in comparable visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, with similar increases in higher-order aberrations.

More Related Videos

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile
05:46

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile

Published on: September 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile
05:46

Correction of Presbyopia by Monocular Bi-Aspheric Ablation Profile

Published on: September 20, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Refractive Surgery
  • Optometry

Background:

  • Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a common refractive surgery procedure.
  • Wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK are distinct approaches to correcting refractive errors.
  • Understanding the comparative outcomes of these LASIK techniques is crucial for patient selection and surgical planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and visual quality outcomes of wavefront-guided LASIK versus wavefront-optimized LASIK.
  • To evaluate the impact of both LASIK techniques on higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity.
  • To assess patient outcomes for myopic astigmatism up to -7.00 diopters sphere and 3.00 diopters cylinder.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, comparative study involving 41 patients.
  • Each patient underwent WFG LASIK in one eye and WFO LASIK in the fellow eye.
  • Ocular wavefront aberrations and contrast sensitivity were measured preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Main Results:

  • Both WFG and WFO LASIK achieved high uncorrected distance visual acuity (20/20 in 89.2% and 83.8% of eyes, respectively) three months postoperatively.
  • Higher-order aberrations, including spherical aberration, increased similarly in both groups.
  • Contrast sensitivity remained stable in both groups, with no statistically significant differences observed between WFG and WFO LASIK.

Conclusions:

  • Wavefront-guided LASIK and wavefront-optimized LASIK yield comparable visual outcomes and contrast sensitivity for myopic astigmatism.
  • Both techniques result in a similar increase in higher-order aberrations post-surgery.
  • Neither technique demonstrated a significant advantage over the other in this patient cohort.