Linking implementation to outcomes: evaluation of a community-based breast and cervical cancer screening program

An implementation analysis of the first eighteen months of the Maryland Breast and Cervical Cancer Program examined the variability among participating local agencies in the extent of screening services delivered; local program implementation processes; and the relationships between extent of screening and the local level processes. The study used: 1) a mail and telephone survey of local health departments (LHD, N = 24) and 2) state program surveillance data, with correlational methods.

1) "Penetration," the proportion of the target population screened; and 2) "Efficiency," the number of women screened per program staff member. Categories of implementation variables were: 1) Environment, 2) Staffing, 3) Collaboration with community organizations, 4) Outreach, 5) Provider variables, 6) Relationships with State and LHDs, 7) Organizational variables, and 8) Service delivery. Results showed wide local variability in screening levels. Availability of local resources; provider involvement; success of community linkages; and local health department readiness showed relationships with the extent of local screening. Studying implementation is needed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of community-based programs.