Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Interactions: Mutualism01:25

Microbial Interactions: Mutualism

Mutualism is a symbiotic interaction in which all participating organisms benefit. These relationships can be obligate or facultative and are fundamental to ecosystem functions across diverse biological systems.Plant–Fungi MutualismOne well-known example is the association between plant roots and mycorrhizal fungi, such as Rhizophagus species. The fungal hyphae penetrate the root hairs and the epidermis, forming an extensive hyphal network that establishes a symbiotic association. Through this...
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores02:40

Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores

Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the biosynthesis of the...
Microbial Interactions: Parasitism01:22

Microbial Interactions: Parasitism

Parasitism is a form of microbial interaction in which parasitic microbes exploit a host organism for nutrients and shelter, often at the host's expense. Unlike mutualistic relationships, where both organisms benefit, parasitism benefits only the parasite and harms the host.Classification of ParasitesMicrobial parasites are broadly classified based on their location relative to the host.Ectoparasites remain on the host’s surface, such as the skin or outer tissues, drawing nutrients...
Microbial Interactions: Competition01:26

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The forest of knowledge under global change.

Nature·2026
Same author

Species loss alters the mesoscale structure of mutualistic networks.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

A response to Portman et al. (2025): USGS Bee Lab collaborative science and big data are essential for understanding bee biodiversity.

Annals of the Entomological Society of America·2026
Same author

Landscape configuration and community structure jointly determine the persistence of mutualists under habitat loss.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Unseen but Impactful: Gout as a Neglected Comorbidity in Cardiovascular Care.

Clinical therapeutics·2026
Same author

A comprehensive, multi-method dataset of plant-frugivore interactions in a Mediterranean hotspot.

Scientific data·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
09:17

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Published on: March 26, 2019

Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks.

Jens M Olesen1, Jordi Bascompte, Yoko L Dupont

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark. jens.olesen@biology.au.dk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|September 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Most ecological interactions are unobserved due to linkage constraints, not under-sampling. Phenological uncoupling significantly explains these missing links in plant-pollinator and seed-dispersal networks.

More Related Videos

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays
14:06

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays

Published on: November 12, 2012

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
09:17

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Published on: March 26, 2019

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays
14:06

Mapping Bacterial Functional Networks and Pathways in Escherichia Coli using Synthetic Genetic Arrays

Published on: November 12, 2012

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Network Theory
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Ecological networks represent species interactions, but many potential links remain unobserved.
  • Unobserved links are categorized as missing (undetected) or forbidden (constrained).
  • Understanding these unobserved links is crucial for accurate ecological network analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the prevalence and causes of unobserved links in ecological networks.
  • To differentiate between missing and forbidden links in pollination and seed-dispersal networks.
  • To quantify the role of phenological constraints in limiting species interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Studied one Arctic pollination and two Mediterranean seed-dispersal networks.
  • Constructed interaction matrices based on direct observations (visits) and indirect evidence (pollen).
  • Analyzed interaction accumulation curves to assess sampling robustness and calculated network connectance (C).

Main Results:

  • A significant proportion of potential links (48-80%) were unobserved across the studied networks.
  • Incorporating pollen data revealed numerous previously undetected links, increasing network connectance.
  • Phenological uncoupling explained 22-28% of unobserved links, highlighting its role as a major constraint.

Conclusions:

  • A large majority of potential ecological interactions are likely forbidden due to inherent constraints, rather than simply missed by sampling.
  • Phenological synchrony is critical for interaction realization, with substantial overlap required for high interaction probability.
  • Linkage constraints, including phenological uncoupling, size mismatch, and accessibility, significantly shape ecological network structure.