Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...

Somatosensation

Somatosensation

The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...

Responses to Gravity and Touch

Responses to Gravity and Touch

Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity

Tactile and Chemical Senses

Tactile and Chemical Senses

Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex. This...

Sensory Functions of the Skin

Sensory Functions of the Skin

The skin is the largest organ of the human body and plays a crucial role in our sensory perception. It contains a vast network of sensory receptors that contribute to the skin's protective function by perceiving physical, biological, and environmental cues and generating relevant responses.
There are two main categories of receptors on the skin: capsulated and non-capsulated. The non-capsulated ones are mainly the pain receptors. The capsulated ones can be further categorized based on the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024

Same author

What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prokofiev was (almost) right: A cross-cultural investigation of auditory-conceptual associations in Peter and the Wolf.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prevalence and predictors of binge eating disorder symptoms among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey.

Health science reports·2023

Same author

More of me: Self-prioritization of numeric stimuli.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023

Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.

Jessica Hartcher-O'Brien¹, Carmel Levitan, Charles Spence

¹Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, 72076, Germany. jhartcher@tuebingen.mpg.de

|September 21, 2010

Summary

Visual stimuli on the body strongly dominate touch perception, a effect lessened when visual stimuli are moved away. This visual dominance is influenced by body representation, even with a rubber hand.

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Multisensory Integration
Human Perception

Background:

Vision typically overrides touch, especially for stimuli near the body.
The Colavita visual dominance effect and the rubber hand illusion are key paradigms for studying crossmodal interactions.
Understanding how stimulus location (on vs. off the body) influences visual dominance is crucial for mapping sensory interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate crossmodal interactions between vision and touch for stimuli presented on versus off the body.
To examine how moving visual stimuli off the body affects visual dominance.
To determine if the presence of a rubber hand influences visuotactile interactions and visual dominance.

Main Methods:

Combined the Colavita visual dominance effect and the rubber hand illusion paradigms.
Participants performed speeded detection/discrimination tasks on unimodal (visual-only, tactile-only) and bimodal (visuotactile) targets.
Visual stimuli were presented either on the fingertip or away from the body, with and without a rubber hand present.

Main Results:

Visuotactile performance was impaired by simultaneous visual stimuli on the body, indicating strong visual dominance.
Visual dominance was significantly reduced when visual stimuli were presented away from the body.
A similar, though reduced, visual dominance effect was observed when a rubber hand was present at the off-body location.

Conclusions:

Visuotactile interactions are strongest when visual stimuli are presented on a body part, regardless of ownership.
The spatial location of visual stimuli relative to the body significantly modulates visual dominance over touch.
Body representation, even when extended (e.g., via a rubber hand), plays a role in mediating crossmodal sensory interactions.