Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
A practical method for transforming free-text eligibility criteria into computable criteria
Samson W Tu1, Mor Peleg, Simona Carini
1Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. swt@stanford.edu
Formalizing clinical trial eligibility criteria is challenging. ERGO annotation offers a practical, semi-automated method to capture criteria semantics, enabling easier patient eligibility determination and study population searches.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Informatics
- Clinical Trial Management
- Natural Language Processing
Background:
- Formalizing clinical trial eligibility criteria is crucial for efficient subject recruitment and study identification.
- Directly translating free-text criteria into formal languages is labor-intensive and complex.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a practical method for converting free-text eligibility criteria into a computer-interpretable format.
- To demonstrate the utility of ERGO annotation for clinical trial operations.
Main Methods:
- Developed ERGO annotation, a format for annotating free-text eligibility criteria.
- Utilized natural language processing techniques for partial automation of annotation.
- Evaluated annotation accuracy, feasibility, and computability using real-world data from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Main Results:
- ERGO annotations effectively capture the semantics of free-text eligibility criteria.
- The annotation process was demonstrated to be feasible.
- ERGO annotations enabled structuring criteria, searching study populations, and screening patients.
Conclusions:
- ERGO annotation provides a practical and incremental approach to formalizing eligibility criteria.
- This method enhances the computability of clinical trial information.
- Facilitates improved eligibility determination and clinical trial recruitment.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
