Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Midterm experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and young adults
Alpay Çeliker1, Haşim Olgun, Tevfik Karagoz
1Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Acıbadem University, Maslak Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are safe for children at high risk of sudden cardiac death, but lead complications and frequent shocks, often due to T-wave oversensing, impact quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing life-threatening arrhythmias in pediatric patients.
- Experience with ICD implantation in children with diverse etiologies is valuable for refining treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the single-center experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and complications associated with ICDs in children with various underlying conditions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent ICD implantation between October 2001 and December 2008.
- Data collection from medical records and computerized databases.
- Analysis of patient demographics, diagnoses, device types, shock data, and complications.
Main Results:
- Twenty-eight pediatric patients (median age 12 years) received ICDs for secondary (n=22) or primary (n=6) prevention.
- Ion-channel diseases and cardiomyopathy were the most common etiologies.
- Appropriate shocks occurred in 68.2% of secondary and 33.3% of primary prevention groups.
- Inappropriate shocks (n=42) occurred in 31.8% of patients, primarily due to T-wave oversensing.
- Lead complications occurred in six patients.
Conclusions:
- ICDs are safe and effective in interrupting malignant arrhythmias in high-risk pediatric patients.
- Lead complications and a high incidence of both appropriate and inappropriate shocks necessitate careful device programming.
- T-wave oversensing is a significant issue contributing to inappropriate shocks, requiring optimized programming to improve patient quality of life.
Aims:
This single-centre study was undertaken to review our experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in children with relatively different aetiologies.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively reviewed the records of the paediatric patients who underwent ICD implantation between October 2001 and December 2008. The data of these patients were collected by reviewing the patients' medical records and computerized departmental pacemaker databases. A total of 28 patients who underwent ICD implantation during this period were included in this study. The median age was 12 years and median weight was 32 kg. Most of the patients had ion-channel diseases (n = 13) or cardiomyopathy (n = 11). Devices were implanted for either secondary (n = 22) or primary (n = 6) prevention. The selected ICD generator type was single chamber in 22 patients, dual chamber in 5 patients, and biventricular in 1. Nineteen patients received 122 shocks. Fifteen of 22 patients (68.2%) from the secondary prevention group and 2 of 6 patients (33.3%) from the primary prevention group experienced at least one appropriate shock during a median period of 11.3 months (range: 4 days-6.5 years). Forty-two inappropriate shocks were delivered in seven (31.8%) patients from the secondary prophylaxis group during a median period of 11.3 months. The most important reason for inappropriate shocks was T-wave oversensing. In six patients, lead-related acute or chronic complications occurred.
Conclusion:
The ICD was safe and effective in interrupting malignant arrhythmias in children and adolescents with a high risk of sudden cardiac death. However, the occurrence of lead complications is significant. The incidence of therapies delivered by the device, with appropriate and inappropriate shocks, was high and interfered with the quality of life. The most important reason for inappropriate shocks was T-wave oversensing. Careful programming is mandatory to reduce the inappropriate shocks.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
