Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Long-Term Memory01:18

Long-Term Memory

Long-term memory is a relatively permanent type of memory, capable of storing vast amounts of information over extended periods. Its storage capacity is generally considered unlimited.
Long-term memory can be categorized into two primary types: explicit and implicit memory. Explicit memory, also known as declarative memory, involves the conscious recollection of information that we deliberately try to remember, recall, and articulate. This type of memory encompasses specific facts, events, and...
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory01:26

Higher Mental Functions of Brain: Learning and Memory

Memory is one of the most vital higher mental functions of the brain. Memory is closely related to learning because it enables us to retain information and experiences from our past to use them in our present life. It also helps us to remember facts, events, and skills, such as riding a bike or swimming. There are two types of memory — declarative memory, which involves memorizing facts or events, and procedural memory, which enables us to remember how to do something like writing or playing an...
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory01:14

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the cerebellum's...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal and Spatial Scales of Human Resting-State Cortical Activity across the Lifespan.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Retrieval from long-term memory does not bypass working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Expansion and compression of space within and beyond the boundaries of an object.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2022
Same author

The Time for Opioid Tapering Blister Packs Has Arrived: an Argument for Prescription Tapering Tools to Combat the Opioid Epidemic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2022
Same author

Advancing Research on Medical Image Perception by Strengthening Multidisciplinary Collaboration.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2022
Same author

"Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing": Retraction.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Spatial context learning survives interference from working memory load.

Timothy J Vickery1, Rachel S Sussman, Yuhong V Jiang

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. tim.vickery@gmail.com

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Implicit learning of spatial context, a key visual optimization, remains unaffected by working memory load. This contextual cuing robustly supports vision even when attention is divided.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The human visual system processes vast information, utilizing attention and implicit learning to optimize perception.
  • Understanding the interplay between attention, working memory, and implicit learning is crucial for explaining visual efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if implicit learning of spatial context is influenced by the working memory load of an irrelevant task.
  • To determine the robustness of contextual cuing under conditions of divided attention.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed visual search tasks with occasionally repeated displays to assess contextual cuing.
  • Working memory load was manipulated using irrelevant tasks involving colors, dot patterns, locations, or multiple targets.
  • The magnitude of contextual cuing was compared between unitary attention and divided attention conditions.

Main Results:

  • Observers demonstrated significant contextual cuing, showing faster search times for repeated displays.
  • The size of the contextual cuing effect was not significantly altered by the level of working memory load.
  • This finding held true across various types of working memory manipulations.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial context learning, as evidenced by contextual cuing, is remarkably robust.
  • Implicit learning of spatial information is resilient to interference from working memory limitations and divided attention.