Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Manufacturing Practices

Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) constitute a foundational set of guidelines that ensure the production of safe, consistent, and high-quality products, particularly in industries such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and food processing. These protocols encompass all aspects of production, from the sourcing of raw materials to the final distribution of the finished product.A core pillar of GMP is stringent hygiene and sanitation across all production environments. This includes routine...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Desensitization to mid-spatial-frequency surface errors.

Optics express·2019

Same author

Representation of freeform surfaces suitable for optimization.

Applied optics·2012

Same author

Rapid optimization of cost-based tolerancing.

Applied optics·2012

Same author

Construction method of axially asymmetric lenses.

Applied optics·2011

Same author

Optimal selection of aspheric surfaces in optical design.

Optics express·2009

Same author

Ketene formation in benzdiyne chemistry: ring cleavage versus Wolff rearrangement.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2003

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

General method of sensitivity control for manufacturing errors.

¹akira.yabe@t-online.de

|September 22, 2010

Summary

This study introduces a new sensitivity control method to minimize manufacturing errors in optical systems. The proposed function improves lens design by optimizing performance metrics.

Area of Science:

Optical Engineering
Manufacturing Science
Image Quality Assessment

Background:

Manufacturing errors in optical systems can degrade performance.
Sensitivity analysis is crucial for robust optical design.
Quantifying the impact of errors is essential for quality control.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate a sensitivity control function for optical manufacturing.
To improve lens design by mitigating the effects of manufacturing variations.
To establish a framework for optimizing optical systems against fabrication tolerances.

Main Methods:

Proposed a wavefront-based sensitivity function.
Utilized modulation transfer function (MTF)-based Monte Carlo simulations for verification.

More Related Videos

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

Implemented direct optimization of simulation results.

Main Results:

The wavefront-based sensitivity function effectively quantifies error impact.
MTF-based Monte Carlo simulations confirmed the function's efficacy.
Direct optimization led to improved lens types with enhanced error tolerance.

Conclusions:

Sensitivity control is vital for producing high-quality optical components.
The proposed wavefront-based method offers a robust approach to error management.
This research contributes to the development of more reliable and precise optical systems.