Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbes in the Production of Fermented Foods01:27

Microbes in the Production of Fermented Foods

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and molds are instrumental in fermenting plant-based foods to enhance preservation and ensure year-round availability. These microbial processes convert plant carbohydrates into organic acids and other metabolites that inhibit spoilage organisms and contribute to the sensory qualities of the final product.In sauerkraut production, cabbage goes through a microbial succession that starts with cocci such as Leuconostoc mesenteroides. These microbes begin fermentation by...
Probiotics01:22

Probiotics

Probiotics are live, non-pathogenic microorganisms that confer health benefits by modulating the gut microbiota. The human gastrointestinal tract harbors a complex microbial ecosystem, and the balance of this microbiota is crucial for digestive and systemic health. Among the most extensively studied and utilized probiotics are species formerly classified within the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. These organisms not only naturally colonize the human gut but are also consumed through...
Microbes in Food Production01:29

Microbes in Food Production

Microbial fermentation is central to food biotechnology, enhancing flavor, texture, preservation, and stability. Fermentative microorganisms metabolize carbohydrates into organic acids, alcohols, and other metabolites that inhibit spoilage organisms and improve digestibility while contributing distinctive sensory qualities.In baking, amylases naturally present in flour hydrolyze starch into monosaccharides such as glucose, which Saccharomyces cerevisiae ferments anaerobically. Through...
Bioplastics01:27

Bioplastics

Bioplastics derived from microbial processes present a sustainable alternative to conventional petroleum-based plastics. Among these, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), particularly polyhydroxybutyrates (PHBs), have emerged as prominent candidates due to their biodegradability and biocompatibility. These polymers are synthesized by a variety of bacteria, such as Cupriavidus necator and Pseudomonas putida, which naturally accumulate PHAs as intracellular carbon and energy reserves, especially under...
What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

Overview
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extendible Prostheses for Children After Resection of Primary Malignant Bone Tumor: Twenty-seven Years of Experience.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2015
Same author

Pt nanoparticles supported on Sb-doped SnO₂ porous structures: developments and issues.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2014
Same author

The pattern of the development of resistance and dependence to carbomycin in Micrococcus pyogenes var. aureus.

Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
Same author

The influence of tumor- and treatment-related factors on the development of local recurrence in osteosarcoma after adequate surgery. An analysis of 1355 patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2010
Same author

Intensified Adjuvant IFADIC Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Sarcoma·2008
Same author

[Upper-extremity amputation in tumours of the shoulder and upper arm--experiences of the Vienna Bone Tumour Registry].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Gnotobiotic System for Studying Microbiome Assembly in the Phyllosphere and in Vegetable Fermentation
07:51

A Gnotobiotic System for Studying Microbiome Assembly in the Phyllosphere and in Vegetable Fermentation

Published on: June 3, 2020

[Megaprostheses: KMFTR to GMRS].

R Kotz1

  • 1Wiener Privatklinik, Pelikangasse 15, 1090 Wien, Osterreich. kotz@wpk.at

Der Orthopade
|September 24, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This article traces the development of megaprostheses from the 1970s to 2002. It begins with Martin Salzer’s ceramic prosthesis for proximal humeral resections in 1972. By 1982, custom-made cementless systems were used for femoral resections. The Howmedica Modular Resection System (HMRS) was introduced in 1988 for lower extremities, with a parallel system for upper extremities. The Global Modular Replacement System (GMRS) became available in 2002. The study highlights the transition from custom to modular designs and the shift from cemented to cementless fixation. It suggests that modular systems improved surgical outcomes through adaptability and reduced implant failure rates.

Keywords:
modular prosthesesorthopedic implant historyHowmedica HMRScementless implants

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Transformation of Probiotic Yeast and Their Recovery from Gastrointestinal Immune Tissues Following Oral Gavage in Mice
12:12

Transformation of Probiotic Yeast and Their Recovery from Gastrointestinal Immune Tissues Following Oral Gavage in Mice

Published on: February 8, 2016

Novel Production Protocol for Small-scale Manufacture of Probiotic Fermented Foods
08:38

Novel Production Protocol for Small-scale Manufacture of Probiotic Fermented Foods

Published on: September 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

A Gnotobiotic System for Studying Microbiome Assembly in the Phyllosphere and in Vegetable Fermentation
07:51

A Gnotobiotic System for Studying Microbiome Assembly in the Phyllosphere and in Vegetable Fermentation

Published on: June 3, 2020

Transformation of Probiotic Yeast and Their Recovery from Gastrointestinal Immune Tissues Following Oral Gavage in Mice
12:12

Transformation of Probiotic Yeast and Their Recovery from Gastrointestinal Immune Tissues Following Oral Gavage in Mice

Published on: February 8, 2016

Novel Production Protocol for Small-scale Manufacture of Probiotic Fermented Foods
08:38

Novel Production Protocol for Small-scale Manufacture of Probiotic Fermented Foods

Published on: September 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery innovations
  • Prosthetic implant design
  • Musculoskeletal oncology

Background:

Prior research has documented the evolution of prosthetic systems for bone tumor resection. It was already known that early implant designs focused on proximal and distal femoral reconstruction. No prior work had resolved the transition from custom-made to modular systems in upper and lower extremities. The need for durable, adaptable prostheses in sarcoma patients remained unmet. Modular systems were not widely adopted until the late 1980s. The shift from cemented to cementless fixation was a key development. Surgeons sought better long-term outcomes with improved implant stability. This gap motivated the development of systems like the HMRS and GMRS.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this historical overview is to trace the evolution of megaprostheses from early ceramic systems to modular designs. It focuses on the transition from custom-made to standardized modular systems. The specific problem addressed is the lack of a comprehensive timeline of key implant systems. The motivation stems from the need to understand how design changes improved patient outcomes. The study highlights the shift from proximal to distal femoral applications. It also examines the parallel development in upper extremity prostheses. The authors emphasize the role of Howmedica in advancing modular systems. This work provides a framework for evaluating current implant technologies.

Main Methods:

The study uses a chronological analysis of implant systems from 1972 to 2002. It reviews the introduction of ceramic prostheses by Salzer in 1972. The analysis includes the transition to cementless modular systems in the 1980s. It traces the development of the HMRS for lower extremities. The study also documents the HMRS adaptation for upper extremities. The Global Modular Replacement System is examined as a later innovation. The authors rely on historical records and manufacturer timelines. The approach emphasizes system design and surgical application shifts.

Main Results:

The earliest megaprostheses were custom-made for proximal femoral resections. By 1982, cementless systems with stem and plate designs were in use. The HMRS system was introduced in 1988 for lower extremity applications. A parallel upper extremity system was developed at the same time. The Global Modular Replacement System became available in 2002. These systems allowed for modular assembly and improved surgical flexibility. The transition from ceramic to modular designs marked a significant shift. The timeline shows a progression from custom to standardized implant systems.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that modular systems improved surgical outcomes through adaptability. They propose that the shift from custom to modular designs reduced implant failure rates. The timeline indicates a gradual refinement of implant technology. The study highlights the role of Howmedica in advancing modular prostheses. It suggests that cementless fixation became standard by the late 1980s. The authors note the parallel development in upper and lower extremity systems. They suggest that the GMRS system represents a culmination of prior innovations. The synthesis of historical data provides a foundation for future implant design.

The HMRS system, introduced in 1988, allowed modular assembly for lower extremity prostheses, improving surgical flexibility.

The GMRS system was introduced in 2002, offering a standardized modular solution for bone tumor resections.

Modular systems allowed for better adaptability and reduced the need for custom fabrication, improving surgical outcomes.

Salzer introduced a ceramic prosthesis system in 1972 for proximal humeral resections in sarcoma patients.

The HMRS used cementless fixation with stem and side plates, unlike earlier custom-made cemented implants.

The timeline suggests a shift from ceramic and custom-made systems to modular, standardized implant designs.