Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Electrophoretic Crystallization of Ultrathin High-performance Metal-organic Framework Membranes
Published on: August 16, 2018
Phase-field crystal modeling of compositional domain formation in ultrathin films
Srevatsan Muralidharan1, Mikko Haataja
1Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA. smuralid@princeton.edu
Abstract:
Bulk-immiscible binary systems often form stress-induced miscible alloy phases when deposited on a substrate. Both alloying and surface dislocation formation lead to the decrease of the elastic strain energy, and the competition between these two strain-relaxation mechanisms gives rise to the emergence of pseudomorphic compositional nanoscale domains, often coexisting with a partially coherent single phase. In this work, we develop a phase-field crystal model for compositional patterning in monolayer aggregates of binary metallic systems. We first demonstrate that the model naturally incorporates the competition between alloying and misfit dislocations, and quantify the effects of misfit and line tension on equilibrium domain size. Then, we quantitatively relate the parameters of the phase-field crystal model to a specific system, CoAg/Ru(0001), and demonstrate that the simulations capture experimentally observed morphologies.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects

