Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
07:57
Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation
Published on: August 21, 2019
Interdependent networks: reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation
Roni Parshani1, Sergey V Buldyrev, Shlomo Havlin
1Minerva Center and Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Physical Review Letters
|September 28, 2010
Summary
Interdependent networks exhibit cascading failures. Reducing network coupling shifts percolation transitions from first to second order, with critical exponent β=1.
Area of Science:
- Complex systems
- Network science
- Statistical physics
Background:
- Interdependent networks are susceptible to cascading failures due to node dependencies.
- Failures in one network can trigger failures in a coupled network, leading to system-wide collapse.
- Understanding these failure dynamics is crucial for robust network design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of coupling strength on percolation phase transitions in interdependent networks.
- To analyze the nature of the phase transition (first-order vs. second-order) as coupling varies.
- To determine the critical exponent governing the order parameter near the transition point.
Main Methods:
- Analytical modeling of interdependent network failures.
- Numerical simulations to observe cascading failures and phase transitions.
- Mathematical analysis of the percolation order parameter and critical exponents.
Main Results:
- A critical fraction of node failures triggers a percolation phase transition, fragmenting both networks.
- Reducing network coupling alters the transition from first-order to second-order at a critical coupling point.
- The system exhibits a critical exponent β=1 for the percolation order parameter near the critical point.
Conclusions:
- Network coupling is a critical parameter controlling the robustness and failure dynamics of interdependent systems.
- The transition from first-order to second-order percolation offers insights into system resilience.
- The universality of the critical exponent β=1 suggests broader applicability in complex system analysis.
Related Concept Videos
01:27¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
The coupling interactions of nuclei across four or more bonds are usually weak, with J values less than 1 Hz. While these are usually not observed in spectra, the presence of multiple bonds along the coupling pathway can result in observable long-range coupling.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.
01:02¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
01:22Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
02:26Protein Networks
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...