Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
An aquatic toxicological evaluation of sulfate: the case for considering hardness as a modifying factor in setting
James R Elphick1, Martin Davies, Guy Gilron
1Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby, BC, Canada. james@nautilusenvironmental.com
Abstract:
Elevated concentrations of sulfate occur commonly in anthropogenically impacted and natural waters. However, water quality guidelines (WQG) have not been developed in many jurisdictions, and chronic toxicity data are scarce for this anion. A variety of test organisms, including species of invertebrate, fish, algae, moss, and an amphibian, were tested for chronic toxicity to develop a robust dataset that could be used to develop WQGs. As an example of how these data might be used to establish guidelines, calculations were performed using two standard procedures: a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach, following methods employed in developing Canadian WQGs, and a safety factor approach, according to procedures typically used in the development of provincial WQGs in British Columbia. The interaction of sulfate toxicity and water hardness was evaluated and incorporated into the calculations, resulting in separate values for soft (10-40 mg/L), moderately hard (80-100 mg/L) and hard water (160-250 mg/L). The resulting values were 129, 644, and 725 mg/L sulfate, respectively, following the SSD approach, and 75, 625, and 675 mg/L sulfate, following the safety factor approach.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Solubility
Quality of Water
Testing Water Quality
Sulfate Attack on Concrete
Sulfates from sources like soil, groundwater, or industrial effluents...
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Acid Mine Drainage
