Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Cochlear implants: histological data].

J Fayad1, F H Linthicum, W F House

  • 1House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057.

Revue De Laryngologie - Otologie - Rhinologie
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Petrous apex cholesterol granuloma: pictorial review of radiological considerations in diagnosis and surgical histopathology.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2013
Same author

Mucocele of the sphenoid sinus; report of a case with autopsy findings.

Journal of neurosurgery·2010
Same author

The audiometer and the diagnosis of deafness.

Eye, ear, nose & throat monthly·2010
Same author

Acoustic Tumours.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2009
Same author

Possible role of biofilm in fulminant meningitis related to cochlear implantation of dysplastic inner ear.

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2009
Same author

Persistent stapedial artery.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2001
Same journal

[Monolingualism, an overlooked multilingual?]

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
Same journal

[Put sound, but the sense, the multilinguisms].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
Same journal

[Implications of multilingualism in the manifestations of stuttering].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
Same journal

[Hearing aids at the International Center of Auditory rehabilitation in Abidjan: Prosthetics gains and satisfaction in patients].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
Same journal

[The Bell Labs contributions to (singing) voice enginee­ring].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
Same journal

[Dysphonia in children: Retrospective and comparative study between the late 1980s and today].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2018
See all related articles

Histological examination of cochlear implants reveals that spiral ganglion cells are stimulated by electrodes. Even 10% of normal spiral ganglion cells can support auditory perception, and long-term electrical stimulation is safe for neural structures.

Area of Science:

  • Otoacoustic emissions
  • Neuroscience
  • Histopathology

Context:

  • Cochlear implantation is a complex surgical procedure.
  • Histological examination of the temporal bone provides crucial insights into the effects of cochlear implants.
  • Understanding the cellular response to cochlear implantation is vital for improving device efficacy and patient outcomes.

Purpose:

  • To histologically examine the pars petrosa in patients with cochlear implants.
  • To correlate morphological findings with clinical data.
  • To determine the neural elements responsible for auditory perception via electrical stimulation and assess the long-term effects of stimulation.

Summary:

  • Histological analysis of 13 implanted patients' pars petrosa revealed that spiral ganglion cells are the primary nerve elements stimulated by electrodes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A reduced number of spiral ganglion cells (as low as 10% of normal) is compatible with auditory perception.
  • Fibrosis and neo-ossification were observed around electrodes, with trauma affecting the organ of Corti and lamina spiralis, but sparing spiral ganglion cells.
  • Prolonged electrical stimulation (up to 14 years) did not adversely affect the survival of spiral ganglion cells, cochlear nerve, or cochlear nucleus.

    • Impact:

    • This study clarifies that spiral ganglion cells are the target for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants.
    • It establishes a minimum threshold of viable spiral ganglion cells for successful auditory perception.
    • Findings indicate the safety of long-term electrical stimulation on neural structures within the cochlea, supporting the durability of cochlear implant function.