Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Contextual modulation of biases in face recognition.
Fatima Maria Felisberti1, Louisa Pavey
1Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University London, London, United Kingdom. f.felisberti@kingston.ac.uk
Plos One
|October 2, 2010
Summary
People recognize prosocial faces better when social rules aren't clear. Explicitly defining cooperation and cheating eliminates this bias, showing flexible social cognition.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Social Neuroscience
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Face recognition is crucial for social exchange and cooperation.
- Previous studies on face recognition biases in social contexts yielded inconsistent results.
- Understanding these biases is key to explaining social interaction dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate biases in face recognition during social exchanges.
- To explore how behavioral descriptors and scenarios influence face recognition accuracy.
- To identify factors contributing to discrepancies in previous research findings.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments involving face memorization with behavioral descriptors (prosocial, antisocial, neutral).
- Face recognition tested using yes-no, forced-choice, and recall tasks (N=174).
- Manipulation of scenario explicitness regarding social contract rules and moral status.
Main Results:
- Enhanced recognition for faces with prosocial descriptors in ambiguous financial scenarios.
- Bias elimination/attenuation when participants were explicitly informed about behavior types.
- Improved recognition for both prosocial and antisocial faces compared to neutral faces in moral judgment scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Face recognition is sensitive to context and descriptors in social exchange scenarios.
- Prosocial face recognition bias emerges in the absence of explicit social rules or moral status.
- Findings suggest flexible cognitive abilities adapt to subtle social context changes.
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Correspondence Bias
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Motivational Bias
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

