Three-dimensional echocardiography using single-heartbeat modality decreases variability in measuring left

Kambiz Shahgaldi1, Aristomenis Manouras, Anna Abrahamsson

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. kambiz.shahgaldi@karolinska.se

Insights

Single-beat 3D echocardiography significantly reduces variability in measuring left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction for patients with atrial fibrillation compared to four-beat methods.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Echocardiography

Background:

  • Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) offers accuracy comparable to cardiac magnetic resonance for left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) assessment.
  • Multibeat 3DE necessitates breath-holding and regular heart rhythm, posing challenges for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) due to potential stitching artifacts.
  • Single-beat (SB) 3DE acquisition may overcome limitations of multibeat techniques in AF patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if SB full volume 3DE acquisition reduces inter- and intraobserver variability in LV volume and EF assessment.
  • To compare SB 3DE with four-beat (4B) ECG-gated 3DE in patients with AF.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 78 patients were studied: 55 in sinus rhythm (group A) and 23 with AF (group B).
  • Both 4B and SB 3DE were performed on all participants.
  • Inter- and intraobserver variability for LV volumes and EF measurements were analyzed for both modalities.

Main Results:

  • SB modality demonstrated significantly lower inter- and intraobserver variability in group B (AF patients) compared to 4B for LV volumes and EF, excluding end-systolic volume (ESV) in intraobserver analysis.
  • Significant differences were observed in LV volume (p < 0.001) and EF (p < 0.05) calculations using SB versus 4B in group B.

Conclusions:

  • SB 3DE appears superior to 4B ECG-gated acquisition for measuring LV volumes and EF in patients with AF.
  • SB 3DE significantly reduces variability in both EF and LV volume measurements in this patient cohort.
Abstract