Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Reasoning

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A comparison of single-domain and multidomain executive functions cognitive training for enhancing cognition and well-being in older adults.

Psychological research·2026

Same author

Age-Related Changes in Theory of Mind in Middle Childhood: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between Australian and Chinese Children.

Developmental neuropsychology·2025

Same author

Gender Differences in Self-Estimated Intelligence: Exploring the Male Hubris, Female Humility Problem.

Frontiers in psychology·2022

Same author

Executive function moderates the relationship between temperament and psychological difficulties in middle childhood.

Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence·2022

Same author

Relations between Executive Functions, Theory of Mind, and Functional Outcomes in Middle Childhood.

Developmental neuropsychology·2021

Same author

A Game a Day Keeps Cognitive Decline Away? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Commercially-Available Brain Training Programs in Healthy and Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.

Neuropsychology review·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.

Glenda Andrews¹

¹School of Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia. g.andrews@griffith.edu.au

Memory & Cognition

|October 6, 2010

Summary

This study shows that people use less belief-based reasoning and more analytic reasoning when problems are easier to understand. Easier premise integration reduces belief bias in transitive inference tasks.

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Behavioral Science

Background:

Dual-process theories propose distinct belief-based and analytic reasoning systems.
Belief bias, the tendency to favor believable conclusions, is well-documented in logical reasoning.
Transitive inference involves deducing relationships from premises, but its susceptibility to belief bias is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the influence of belief-based versus analytic processing in transitive inference.
To examine how premise integration difficulty affects belief bias.
To explore the relationship between cognitive abilities and belief bias in this reasoning task.

Main Methods:

Three experiments manipulated premise integration difficulty (time, order, term markedness).
Conclusion acceptance rates for valid/invalid and believable/unbelievable conclusions measured belief and analytic processing.
Fluid intelligence and premise integration ability were assessed.

Main Results:

Reasoning accuracy and confidence decreased on conflict problems where belief and analytic processes diverged.
Easier premise integration led to increased reliance on analytic processing and decreased belief-based processing.
Fluid intelligence and integration ability predicted analytic reasoning on conflict problems.

Conclusions:

Belief bias demonstrably affects transitive inference, challenging previous assumptions.
Premise integration difficulty modulates the balance between belief-based and analytic reasoning.
Individual differences in cognitive abilities are linked to analytical reasoning performance in the face of belief bias.