Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

08:54
Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018
Interfraction liver shape variability and impact on GTV position during liver stereotactic radiotherapy using
Cynthia L Eccles1, Laura A Dawson, Joanne L Moseley
1Princess Margaret Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. cynthia.eccles@rob.ox.ac.uk
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|October 16, 2010
Summary
Interfraction liver shape changes during SBRT with abdominal compression are minimal, generally under 5 mm. This ensures accurate liver tumor targeting with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Computational Anatomy
Background:
- Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) utilizes abdominal compression to minimize organ motion and daily image guidance for setup accuracy.
- The consistency of liver shape under compression is crucial for precise treatment delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify interfractional liver shape variability during SBRT with abdominal compression.
- To assess the impact of this variability on gross tumor volume (GTV) position after rigid registration.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 83 kilovoltage cone beam CT (CBCT) scans from 16 patients undergoing SBRT with abdominal compression.
- Respiratory sorted CBCT scans were rigidly registered to exhale planning CT scans.
- Deformable registration (MORFEUS) was used to measure liver shape differences.
Main Results:
- Mean liver deformation exceeding 3 mm was 21.7%, with a maximum of 36.3% in one patient (excluding outliers).
- Maximum interfractional deformations were 10.5 mm (left-right), 12.9 mm (anterior-posterior), and 5.6 mm (superior-inferior).
- The mean impact of liver displacement on GTV position was minimal (<0.13 mm in all directions).
Conclusions:
- Interfraction liver deformations under abdominal compression during SBRT are generally small (<5 mm) after rigid registration.
- These findings suggest that liver shape variability does not significantly compromise GTV targeting accuracy in most patients.

