Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
[Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil on the tolerance response to electrical tetanus
Lu Yang1, Bin Wei, Li-ping Zhang
1Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Objective:
To describe the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil in suppressing somatic and hemodynamic responses to electrical tetanus stimuli (ETS) during induction of intravenous anesthesia with response surface method.
Methods:
Seventy patients of ASA I or II, aged 18-65 years, scheduled for elective surgery were anesthetized by propofol and remifentanil. Propofol was administered with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) device at a target concentration that remained constant throughout the study, and remifentanil was administered with a TCI device at increasing staircase target concentrations. The somatic and hemodynamic responses to electrical tetanus stimuli were assessed multiple times after allowing for plasma effect site equilibration. The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil was analyzed by response surface method. The three-dimensional response surfaces were constructed with Minitab Software. Model parameters were estimated with NONMEM.
Results:
Response surface method characterized the pharmacodynamic interactions between propofol (0-9 mg/L) and remifentanil (0-10 μg/L) qualitatively and quantitatively. The three-dimensional response surfaces showed considerable synergy between propofol and remifentani for blunting somatic and hemodynamic responses to ETS. When the target concentration of remifentani was 1 μg/L, 2 μg/L and 3 μg/L, the C50 of propofol for blunting somatic responses to ETS decreased by 40.1%, 71.5% and 82.1% respectively; and the C50 of propofol for blunting hemodynamic responses to ETS decreased by 45.0%, 72.8% and 83.7% respectively. However, further increases in remifentanil only modestly reduced the C50 of propofol associated with loss of response to ETS. Ceiling effect was seen.
Conclusion:
Response surface method can analyze the pharmacodynamic interactions qualitatively and quantitatively. The response surface models revealed the significant synergy between propofol (≤9 mg/L) and remifentanil (≤10 μg/L) for blunting somatic and hemodynamic responses to electrical tetanus stimuli. The ceiling effects of remifentanil were demonstrated in the reduction of propofol C50 regarding tolerance of responses to ETS.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Drug Toxicity: Dose-Dependent Reactions
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...