Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Separable Differential Equations01:20

Separable Differential Equations

A separable differential equation is a type of first-order differential equation where the derivative dy/dx can be expressed as a product of two functions: one that depends only on x and another that depends only on y. This allows for the rearrangement of the equation so that all terms involving y are on one side, and all terms involving x are on the other. This process, known as the separation of variables, simplifies the process of solving the equation by enabling the integration of both...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Closed-loop readout of anterior insula high-gamma activity steers value-based decisions.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Food Avoidance and Restriction in Anorexia Nervosa: Gaze Behavior During Preference Evaluations and the Willingness to Eat Foods With Different Caloric Values.

The International journal of eating disorders·2026
Same author

Oxytocin modulates the neurocomputational mechanisms engaged in learning rank relationships in social networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Differential effects of levodopa on social cognition in people with Parkinson's disease.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Learning to adaptively cooperate through social interactions during childhood and adolescence.

NPJ science of learning·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Separate valuation subsystems for delay and effort decision costs.

Charlotte Prévost1, Mathias Pessiglione, Elise Météreau

  • 1Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité mixte de recherche 5229, Reward and Decision Making Team, 69675 Bron, France.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|October 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The human brain devalues rewards associated with effort similarly to delays. However, distinct neural systems value delayed rewards versus effort costs, showing how the brain processes different decision-making costs.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Decision-making models often use utility functions to quantify outcome desirability based on costs and benefits.
  • Understanding how the brain values different types of costs is crucial for decision-making research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the human brain employs separate valuation systems for rewards associated with delay versus physical effort costs.
  • To determine if a unified computational model can explain behavior across both delay and effort discounting.

Main Methods:

  • Model-based neuroimaging was utilized to analyze brain activity during decision-making tasks.
  • Behavioral data were analyzed using computational models derived from economic theory.

Main Results:

  • Behaviorally, rewards associated with physical effort were devalued similarly to those associated with delays.
  • A single economic model successfully accounted for both delay and effort discounting behaviors.
  • Neuroimaging revealed distinct neural subsystems: ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex for delayed rewards, and anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula for effort costs.

Conclusions:

  • The human brain utilizes distinct neural pathways for valuing delayed rewards and effort-related costs.
  • Valuation processes for different cost types can be fractionated at the cerebral level.
  • These findings provide critical insights into the neural mechanisms of decision-making under varying cost conditions.