Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Notes on Rayleigh's hypothesis and the extended boundary condition method.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same author

Convergence of the iterative T-matrix method.

Optics express·2020
Same author

A numerical study of acoustic scattering by Janus spheres.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

Modeling optical properties of particles with small-scale surface roughness: combination of group theory with a perturbation approach.

Optics express·2011
Same author

Scattering database for spheroidal particles.

Applied optics·2009
Same author

Light scattering on Chebyshev particles of higher order.

Applied optics·2006
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:10

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Case study about the accuracy behavior of three different T-matrix methods.

Tom Rother1, Jochen Wauer

  • 1German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute, Kalkhorstweg 53, D-17235 Neustrelitz, Germany. m.Rother@dlr.de

Applied Optics
|October 22, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares two weighting function sets for T-matrix scattering calculations. Different weighting functions impact near-field and far-field accuracy, guiding the choice for specific applications like analyzing particle scattering.

More Related Videos

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships
06:05

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships

Published on: April 20, 2022

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
08:48

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics

Published on: January 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:10

Evaluating Tests of Cognition using a Computerized Touch-Sensitive Tablet, Eye Tracking, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: January 30, 2026

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships
06:05

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships

Published on: April 20, 2022

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics
08:48

Combining Multiple Data Acquisition Systems to Study Corticospinal Output and Multi-segment Biomechanics

Published on: January 9, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Computational physics
  • Electromagnetics
  • Wave scattering

Background:

  • T-matrix methods are crucial for solving scattering problems.
  • Weighting functions significantly influence the accuracy of numerical solutions.
  • Understanding near-field and far-field behavior is essential for practical applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of two distinct weighting function sets on T-matrix calculation accuracy.
  • To compare the accuracy behavior in near-field and far-field scattering regimes.
  • To establish criteria for selecting appropriate weighting functions based on application needs.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation and comparison of two weighting function sets in T-matrix calculations.
  • Analysis of scalar scattering problems.
  • Application of criteria to an iterative T-matrix approach for irregular geometries.

Main Results:

  • Both weighting function sets exhibit converse accuracy behavior in near and far fields.
  • Reciprocity and boundary condition fulfillment are key factors in selecting weighting functions.
  • The iterative T-matrix approach demonstrates usefulness for analyzing Chebyshev particles.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of weighting functions critically affects T-matrix calculation accuracy.
  • Application-specific criteria, including reciprocity, are necessary for optimal weighting function selection.
  • The developed iterative T-matrix method is effective for scattering analysis of complex particle geometries.