Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of lung imaging at 0.55T for assessment of interstitial lung disease in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis.

European radiology·2026
Same author

AI-Based Opportunistic CT Risk Assessment Using TotalSegmentator in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing Visual Function in Retinal Gene Therapy.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2026
Same author

AI-Based Myocardial Segmentation and Attenuation Mapping Improved Detection of Myocardial Ischemia and Infarction on Emergency CT Angiography.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Impact of CT dose on AI performance: A comparison of radiomics, deep, and foundation models in a multicentric anthropomorphic phantom study.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Impact of pulsed stimulation on objective and subjective visual acuity measurements in nystagmus.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

A primer on common statistical errors in clinical ophthalmology.

Karen Holopigian1, Michael Bach

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. kh19@nyu.edu

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|October 26, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review highlights common statistical analysis errors in scientific literature, offering practical guidance on data interpretation and visualization to improve research quality.

More Related Videos

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Statistics
  • Scientific Research Methodology

Background:

  • Statistical data analysis in scientific literature often requires improvement.
  • Biomedical statistics is a fundamental component of scientific education.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address common issues in statistical data analysis.
  • To provide an intuitive, tutorial approach to statistical problem-solving.
  • To improve the quality of statistical reporting in scientific publications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common problems in statistical analysis.
  • Tutorial-style explanation of statistical concepts.
  • Focus on practical application rather than rigorous proofs.

Main Results:

  • Identified common pitfalls in statistical analysis.
  • Discussed issues with unit of analysis (eyes vs. patients).
  • Highlighted problems with multiple testing and correlation coefficients.
  • Clarified appropriate use of standard deviation (SD) vs. standard error of the mean (SEM).

Conclusions:

  • Addressing common statistical errors can enhance research integrity.
  • Clearer understanding and application of statistical methods are crucial.
  • Improved statistical practices lead to more reliable scientific findings.