Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Quasi-static and harmonic indentation of osteonal bone
S S Huja1, J L Hay, A M Rummel
1College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Quasi-Static (QS) and continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) indentation methods showed similar results for bone mechanical properties. The only significant difference was in hardness for unlabeled osteons, suggesting both methods are viable for bone research.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Materials Science
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Bone mechanical properties are crucial for understanding skeletal health and disease.
- Indentation testing is a common method for measuring bone mechanical properties at the microscale.
- Quasi-Static (QS) and Continuous Stiffness Measurement (CSM) are two distinct indentation techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the Quasi-Static (QS) and Continuous Stiffness Measurement (CSM) indentation methods for measuring bone mechanical properties.
- To evaluate the reliability and consistency of both methods in assessing indentation modulus (IM) and hardness (H).
Main Methods:
- Bone sections from canine mid-femoral diaphyses were used.
- Osteons were identified as labeled (n=35) and unlabeled (n=112).
- Indentation tests were performed using both QS and CSM methods, with data collected at specific depths and loading cycles.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found in indentation modulus (IM) between QS and CSM methods for both labeled and unlabeled osteons.
- Hardness (H) showed no significant difference for labeled osteons but was significantly different for unlabeled osteons (P = .017).
- CSM method showed no significant difference in IM across different depths (100-500 nm), indicating a lack of detected viscoelasticity at this scale.
Conclusions:
- Both QS and CSM indentation methods provide comparable measurements of bone mechanical properties, particularly indentation modulus.
- The CSM method may offer a more nuanced assessment of hardness in specific bone microstructures.
- Bone viscoelasticity was not detected at the tested microscale using these indentation methods.
Related Concept Videos
Compact Bone
Compact bone, also called cortical bone, is the denser, stronger of the two types of bone tissue. It is found under the periosteum and in the diaphyses of long bones, where it provides support and protection. The microscopic structural unit of compact bone is called an osteon, or haversian system. Each osteon is composed of concentric rings of calcified...
Bone Remodeling
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification
The Bone Matrix
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into...
Spongy Bone
Spongy bone is more porous, and less dense compared to compact bone. It is composed of concentric lamellae that are arranged irregularly to form the trabecular network. In some bones, the spaces between trabeculae contain red marrow, where...

