Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Mitral valve area by the pressure half-time method does not correlate with mean gradient in mitral valve repair
Chad M House1, William B Nelson, Glenn A Nickele
1Section of Cardiology, Regions Hospital, 640 Jackson Street, Mail Stop 11102M, St. Paul, MN 55101, USA. chad.m.house@healthpartners.com
Aims:
Pressure half-time is an inaccurate measure of mitral valve area in many clinical situations. The utility of the pressure half-time method to calculate mitral valve area after mitral valve repair is not well defined.
Methods And Results:
Forty-two patients with a repaired mitral valve were identified. Mitral valve area was calculated by both the pressure half-time method and the continuity equation. The two mitral valve areas were then directly compared and also correlated with mean gradient. The two mitral valve areas were significantly different from one another with a mean of 1.81 ± 0.53 cm(2) by continuity equation and 2.65 ± 0.69 cm(2) by pressure half-time. The continuity equation correlated well with mean gradient (ρ = -0.63), whereas the correlation for pressure half-time was weak (r = -0.08).
Conclusion:
A non-linear, inverse correlation was found between mitral valve area by the continuity equation and mean gradient. No correlation was found between the pressure half-time method for mitral valve area and mean gradient. The continuity equation likely provides a better estimate of mitral valve area in repaired mitral valves.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
