Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Control Systems

Control Systems

Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...

Open and closed-loop control systems

Open and closed-loop control systems

Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal and...

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems

Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Intraoperative Management of Tracheal Cautery Injury in a Post-Bypass Cardiac Surgery Patient.

Military medicine·2022

Same author

Subspace wavefront estimation using image sharpening and predictive dynamic digital holography.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2020

Same author

Predictive dynamic digital holography and image sharpening.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2018

Same author

Rates and Correlates of Syphilis Reinfection in Men Who Have Sex with Men.

LGBT health·2016

Same author

Collimated focal ratio degradation testing for highly multiplexed fiber systems-an improvement to a standard test.

Applied optics·2016

Same author

Day and Night Closed-Loop Control Using the Integrated Medtronic Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Type 1 Diabetes at Diabetes Camp.

Diabetes care·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

Adaptive control in an adaptive optics experiment.

Salman Monirabbasi¹, Steve Gibson

¹Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1597, USA. salmanm@ucla.edu

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision

|November 4, 2010

Summary

This study introduces an advanced adaptive optics (AO) control loop that significantly reduces wavefront errors. The new system enhances image sharpness compared to traditional AO methods.

More Related Videos

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Area of Science:

Optics and Photonics
Control Systems Engineering

Background:

Classical adaptive optics (AO) systems use feedback loops to correct wavefront distortions.
Existing AO systems face limitations in achieving optimal wavefront correction efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate an enhanced adaptive optics control loop.
To improve wavefront correction accuracy and resulting image quality.

Main Methods:

Implemented a novel adaptive control loop augmenting a classical AO feedback loop.
Utilized a self-referencing interferometer to measure closed-loop wavefront errors.
Employed frequency-weighted deformable mirror modes and new wavefront sensor modes for control and analysis.
Used a diagnostic target camera to image the corrected laser beam.

Main Results:

Demonstrated reduced closed-loop wavefront errors with the enhanced control loop.
Achieved sharper diagnostic target images compared to the classical AO loop.
Validated the effectiveness of the new control and sensor modes.

Conclusions:

The augmented adaptive optics control loop offers superior performance over classical AO.
The proposed methods significantly improve wavefront correction and image fidelity.